Re: [REGRESSION] mainline/master: Apalis iMX6 no longer boots
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:40:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,dev.linux.lists.imx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260716164058.GA16414@bhelgaas> |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 02:15:42AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu (OSS) wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 11:34:32AM -0300, Leonardo Costa wrote: > > > We are seeing a regression on Apalis iMX6 where the kernel > > > doesn't boot in the newest v7.2-rc1 (it was working before, in > > > v7.1). The device tree being used is the imx6q-apalis-eval.dtb. > > > The kernel configuration > > > used is the one shown below: > ... > > Can somebody confirm that reverting 610fa91d9863 fixes this > > regression, or at least that 610fa91d9863^ works and 610fa91d9863 > > fails? > > Sorry for this severe regression. I have posted a fix that has been > tested on my i.MX6Q SabreSD board: > > https://lore.kernel.org/imx/[email protected]/ My question was whether somebody had actually bisected to 610fa91d9863 ("PCI: imx6: Assert PERST# before enabling regulators"). I don't see anything specific on the mailing list, so I don't know how 610fa91d9863 got blamed for the regression. https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/mainline/ lists this as a regression caused by 610fa91d9863, which means we need (1) the details to prove that 610fa91d9863 actually caused it and (2) a tested revert or fix.