Re: [PATCH 6.12 0000/1202] 6.12.97-rc2 review
Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:38:54 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,dev.linux.lists.patches,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/24/26 08:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 04:17:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 04:31:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.97 release. >>> There are 1202 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >> >> I'm seeing a regression in the proc read kselftest which bisects to >> "proc: protect ptrace_may_access() with exec_update_lock (part 1)": > # selftests: proc: read > [ 167.845745] ICMPv6: process `read' is using deprecated sysctl (syscall) net.ipv6.neigh.default.base_reachable_time - use net.ipv6.neigh.default.base_reachable_time_ms instead > [...]>> Full log: >> >> https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/3014030#L10663 > > Odd, and this is not regressing in Linus's tree as well? Did we miss > something that is needed here that mainline has? Mark, is this maybe the same as: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ A fix for it is here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ It looks like it fell through the cracks for 2 weeks, but I prodded there two days ago and Christian since then picked the fix up (and I guess will send it to Linus soon). Ciao, Thorsten