Re: [REGRESSION] 6.12.36+: usb: hub: post-resume delayed work triggers > uncorrected MCE / data fabric sync flood on Threadripper 7970X > (bisected to aec11e5f9c45)
Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/24/26 14:37, Mathieu Fluhr wrote: >> The issue is obviously a severe HW malfunction (you mentioned MCEs, the >> Ryzen CPUs simply totally locked up), triggered by poking certain xHCI >> controllers on the I/O die of these CPUs in some wrong way. > > Yes. As mentioned, I first thought that the emulator itself triggered that by > doing something that the CPU did not like.To be honest, I barely play with old > Android versions anymore, but seeing that I could reproduce it even with > Android 13 or 14 made me suspicious. > > I _guess_ Google implemented a workaround inside adb for version Android > 15 since using this version, it remains stable for more than 2 hours. > > But, in the end, the situation is that from a simple user account having access > to some usb plugged in devices (I usually add my user account to the plugdev > group and use some known udev rules to access my Android tests devices), > you have a way to crash the complete system. > >> Opinions seem to vary on whether CPU load must be present or absent. > > On my side (and I am here only speaking about my TR. I don't know about > other Ryzen CPUs), I can't reproduce it under load, and one condition to > reproduce it is my CPU going in C2 state. > -> I did a 2:30 hour test using several youtube videos playing at the same > time on my desktop, also stressing the emulator with some 3D Mark runs > (as mentioned, I first suspected the nvidia driver to be faulty). As long as my > computer was busy everything went fine. But then I let it stand still for a few > minutes, and it just crashed. > > If you need me to do some further tests or experiments, let me know. I will > be more than happy to play the guinea pig here. > The behavior that is described here sounds like a platform firmware bug to me. Are you on the latest BIOS available from your OEM? Can you please confirm: 1. Your CPU model number/codename 2. Your OEM (from /sys/class/dmi/id) 3. OEM BIOS version (from /sys/class/dmi/id) 4. AGESA version (see commit bc91133e260c8113c1119073c03b93c12aa41738 if the OEM didn't tear it out. Otherwise look in BIOS menus)?