Re: [PATCH wireless] wifi: mt76: mt792x: fix NULL dereference in ACPI SAR init during probe
Klara Modin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mediatek,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-25 11:17:12 -0700, Devin Wittmayer wrote: > Some laptops carry a MediaTek power table in their firmware, and the > driver reads it to set a transmit limit for each frequency range. It > only fills in the ranges themselves when it registers the device. > > The startup step that does this existed already, but it never programmed > anything. These two commits made it run a regulatory update instead, > which sets the limits on the way through, long before registration. So on > a machine that has the table the driver reads through an empty pointer > and the interface never appears: > > BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000004 > RIP: 0010:mt792x_init_acpi_sar_power > Call Trace: > mt7921_set_tx_sar_pwr > mt7921_mcu_regd_update > mt7921_regd_update > mt7921_run_firmware > mt7921e_mcu_init > mt7921_init_work > > Skip it when the ranges are missing. They are applied again once the > device is up, which is where they came from before. > > Reported-by: Klara Modin <[email protected]> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/[email protected]/ > Fixes: 9b80bd9cab40 ("wifi: mt76: mt7921: add regulatory wiphy self manager support") > Fixes: e9f3f1cc133f ("wifi: mt76: mt7925: add regulatory wiphy self manager support") > Signed-off-by: Devin Wittmayer <[email protected]> > --- > > Reproduced on both chips before sending, an MT7922 and an MT7925, and the > fix clears both. Neither machine here ships a vendor power table, so I > supplied one through an ACPI override in the initrd. It also wants recent > firmware. The June builds do not turn on self-managed regulatory and > nothing happens; the builds now in linux-firmware do, and then it dies > exactly as reported with no interface at all. Patched, both come up and > scan normally, and the injected limits still show through in the power > table afterwards, so the skip does not lose them. > > With that table still in place and the fix absent, backing out the mt7921 > commit on its own also boots clean, so the table is not what causes this. > Thanks for the quick fix! Regards, Tested-by: Klara Modin <[email protected]> > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt792x_acpi_sar.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt792x_acpi_sar.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt792x_acpi_sar.c > index 946dd7956e4a..b468051fbe68 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt792x_acpi_sar.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt792x_acpi_sar.c > @@ -323,7 +323,8 @@ int mt792x_init_acpi_sar_power(struct mt792x_phy *phy, bool set_default) > const struct cfg80211_sar_capa *capa = phy->mt76->hw->wiphy->sar_capa; > int i; > > - if (!phy->acpisar || !((struct mt792x_acpi_sar *)phy->acpisar)->dyn) > + if (!capa || !phy->acpisar || > + !((struct mt792x_acpi_sar *)phy->acpisar)->dyn) > return 0; > > /* When ACPI SAR enabled in HW, we should apply rules for .frp > -- > 2.55.0 >