Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] x86/virt/tdx: Make TDX module initialize the extensions
Xiaoyao Li <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.kvm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/24/2026 1:03 AM, Xu Yilun wrote:
>>> +/* Initialize TDX module extensions for extension SEAMCALLs */
>>> +static __init int tdx_ext_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct tdx_module_args args = {};
>>> + u64 r;
>>> +
>>> + do {
>>> + r = seamcall(TDH_EXT_INIT, &args);
>>> + } while (r == TDX_INTERRUPTED_RESUMABLE);
>>> +
>>> + if (r != TDX_SUCCESS)
>>> + return -EFAULT;
As Chao caught in patch 04, we need to return -EIO here for consistence.
>>
>> [Severity: Medium]
>> Does this code silently discard the 64-bit hardware error code?
>>
>> When TDH_EXT_INIT fails, replacing the return value with -EFAULT means
>> the caller only logs a generic initialization failure without details.
>> Other TDX initialization functions use seamcall_prerr_ret() to preserve
>> and log the hardware error.
>>
>> Could this be updated to use seamcall_prerr_ret() to ensure the exact
>> firmware failure reason is logged?
>
> No, it can't use seamcall_prerr_ret() directly. TDX_INTERRUPTED_RESUMABLE
> can't be handled in a unified way for all SEAMCALLs so can't embed in
> fundamental seamcall wrappers. I see 2 conventions:
>
> 1. Host should set a resume=1 parameter on retry, such as,
> TDH_PHYMEM_CACHE_WB, and several migration SEAMCALLs,
> TDH.EXPORT.MEM, TDH.EXPORT.STATE.XXX
>
> 2. Host just refills the previous args (may have been modified by seamcall
> output) on retry. Much more examples, TDH_EXT_INIT, TDH_EXT_MEM_ADD,
> TDH_QUOTE_INIT, TDH_QUOTE_GET...
>
> So I think there is a need the callers have to:
>
> 1. call seamcall() or seamcall wrappers (tdh_xxx)
> 2. specific handling of raw SEAMCALL return code
> 3. do a standard TDX error logging and Linux errno conversion.
>
> seamcall_prerr_ret() does 1 & 2 & 3, but can't customize step 2.
>
> I tried to add some TDX error logging & errno conversion helpers, most of
> the code are abstracted from seamcall_prerr_ret(), see below.
>
> But I'm not sure if it worths the churn.
Though I have some comment, below refactor doesn't look so bad.
The only risk is existing SEAMCALL warppers is a mess and people may not
want to add any more before re-work them. So the conservative option
would to just add an ad-hoc pr_err() for !TDX_SUCCESS case?
> ----8<----
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/seamcall_internal.h b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/seamcall_internal.h
> index be5f446467df..f838715c9446 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/seamcall_internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/seamcall_internal.h
> @@ -78,12 +78,10 @@ static inline void seamcall_err_ret(u64 fn, u64 err,
> args->r9, args->r10, args->r11);
> }
>
> -static __always_inline int sc_retry_prerr(sc_func_t func,
> - sc_err_func_t err_func,
> - u64 fn, struct tdx_module_args *args)
> +static inline int sc_errno_prerr(sc_err_func_t err_func,
> + u64 fn, u64 sret,
> + struct tdx_module_args *args)
> {
> - u64 sret = sc_retry(func, fn, args);
> -
> if (sret == TDX_SUCCESS)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -100,10 +98,25 @@ static __always_inline int sc_retry_prerr(sc_func_t func,
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> +static __always_inline int sc_retry_prerr(sc_func_t func,
> + sc_err_func_t err_func,
> + u64 fn, struct tdx_module_args *args)
> +{
> + u64 sret = sc_retry(func, fn, args);
> +
> + return sc_errno_prerr(err_func, fn, sret, args);
> +}
> +
> #define seamcall_prerr(__fn, __args) \
> sc_retry_prerr(__seamcall, seamcall_err, (__fn), (__args))
>
> #define seamcall_prerr_ret(__fn, __args) \
> sc_retry_prerr(__seamcall_ret, seamcall_err_ret, (__fn), (__args))
>
> +#define seamcall_errno_prerr(__fn, __sret, __args) \
> + sc_errno_prerr(seamcall_err, (__fn), (__sret), (__args))
> +
> +#define seamcall_errno_prerr_ret(__fn, __sret, __args) \
> + sc_errno_prerr(seamcall_err_ret, (__fn), (__sret), (__args))
We don't need these two wrappers.
The existing seamcall_prerr() and seamcall_prerr_ret() do two things:
1. call SEAMCALL;
2. handling the return code of SEAMCALL;
But the 2 new wrappers only do setp 2. So we can just call
sc_errno_prerr() in the following cases ...
> #endif /* _X86_VIRT_SEAMCALL_INTERNAL_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> index 826504fbcdc7..637ff01ed0f1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -1403,10 +1403,7 @@ static int tdx_ext_init(void)
> r = seamcall(TDH_EXT_INIT, &args);
> } while (r == TDX_INTERRUPTED_RESUMABLE);
>
> - if (r != TDX_SUCCESS)
> - return -EFAULT;
> -
> - return 0;
> + return seamcall_errno_prerr(TDH_EXT_INIT, r, &args);
... return sc_errno_prerr(seamcall_err, TDH_EXT_INIT, r, &args);
and
> }
>
> #define HPA_LIST_INFO_FIRST_ENTRY GENMASK_U64(11, 3)
> @@ -1438,10 +1435,7 @@ static __init int tdx_ext_mem_add(struct page *hpa_list_page,
> r = seamcall_ret(TDH_EXT_MEM_ADD, &args);
> } while (r == TDX_INTERRUPTED_RESUMABLE);
>
> - if (r != TDX_SUCCESS)
> - return -EFAULT;
> -
> - return 0;
> + return seamcall_errno_prerr_ret(TDH_EXT_MEM_ADD, r, &args);
... return sc_errno_prerr(seamcall_err_ret, TDH_EXT_MEM_ADD, r, &args);
> }