Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf: Avoid redundant min()/max() in cnum signed bounds

Vinicius Sampaio <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 23:58:07 +0000

Newsgroups	dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.bpf
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

> [Severity: Low]
> This isn't a bug, but should the opening '/*' be on its own line to align
> with the preferred BPF subsystem multi-line comment style?

Yes, it does, I'll fix that.

> [Severity: Low]
> This isn't a bug, but similar to the comment above, would it be better
> to place the opening '/*' on its own line here as well?

Yes!