Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/5] bpf: simplify the bpf_is_reg64()
Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Sun, 02 Aug 2026 14:40:59 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.bpf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2026-08-02 at 21:26 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issu= e(s) to consider: > - [Critical] bpf_is_reg64() fails to identify BPF_ADDR_SPACE_CAST operati= ons with imm =3D=3D 1U << 16 as 32-bit when the arena has BPF_F_NO_USER_CON= V set, leading to missing zero-extension and possible sandbox escape. > - [Critical] Unconditional overwrite of `zext_dst` destroys manual overri= des for `PTR_TO_ARENA` arithmetic, leading to missing zero-extensions and a= rbitrary kernel memory access. > -- >=20 > --- Patch [4]: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/5] bpf: simplify the bpf_is_reg64() -= -- > commit 4ece654ab9bc1fb0f5d2f2cc247cae7c94f2cb89 > Author: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> >=20 > bpf: simplify the bpf_is_reg64() >=20 > This commit simplifies bpf_is_reg64() by removing unused parameters, > removing BPF_JMP instructions handling, and streamlining conditions. It > also moves the function to kernel/bpf/fixups.c. >=20 > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c > > index 6125598d16a84..7b3510d46b377 100644 > > --- a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c >=20 > [ ... ] >=20 > > @@ -44,6 +44,49 @@ static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *ins= n) > > =C2=A0 } > > =C2=A0} > > =C2=A0 > > +/* > > + * For use only in combination with insn_def_regno() >=3D 0. > > + * Returns TRUE if the destination register operates on 64-bit, > > + * otherwise return FALSE. > > + */ > > +static bool bpf_is_reg64(struct bpf_insn *insn) > > +{ > > + u8 class =3D BPF_CLASS(insn->code); > > + u8 mode =3D BPF_MODE(insn->code); > > + u8 size =3D BPF_SIZE(insn->code); > > + u8 op =3D BPF_OP(insn->code); > > + bool mode_mem; > > + > > + /* subregister endiness swap */ > > + if ((class =3D=3D BPF_ALU || class =3D=3D BPF_ALU64) && op =3D=3D BPF= _END && insn->imm !=3D 64) > > + return false; > > + > > + /* w0 +=3D 1 */ > > + if (class =3D=3D BPF_ALU && op !=3D BPF_END) > > + return false; > > + > > + /* cast from as(1) to as(0), PTR_TO_ARENA is 32-bit */ > > + if (insn->code =3D=3D (BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X) && > > + =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 insn->off =3D=3D BPF_ADDR_SPACE_CAST && insn->imm = =3D=3D 1) > > + return false; >=20 > [Severity: Critical] > Does this logic miss identifying BPF_ADDR_SPACE_CAST operations with > imm =3D=3D 1U << 16 as 32-bit? >=20 > If the arena has BPF_F_NO_USER_CONV set, bpf_do_misc_fixups() rewrites > all BPF_ADDR_SPACE_CAST instructions (including imm =3D=3D 1U << 16) into > a 32-bit MOV to explicitly clear the upper 32 bits. I think this is a pre-existing bug. I'll add a test. ... > > +/* > > + * Return the 32-bit subregister defined by INSN, or -1 if INSN does n= ot > > + * explicitly define a 32-bit value. > > + */ > > +int bpf_insn_def32(struct bpf_insn *insn) > > +{ > > + int dst_reg =3D insn_def_regno(insn); > > + > > + if (dst_reg < 0 || bpf_is_reg64(insn)) > > + return -1; >=20 > [Severity: Critical] > Would this unconditional behavior inadvertently overwrite manual override= s > for PTR_TO_ARENA arithmetic? No it won't. convert_ctx_access() downgrades those operations to BPF_ALU. There is also a test to check this. ...