Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: nuvoton,ma35d1-qspi: Disallow GPIO chip selects
Chi-Wen Weng <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:26:26 +0800
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] 於 2026/8/3 上午 10:48 寫道: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: > - [Medium] The commit disallows the `cs-gpios` property in the DT binding based solely on a current Linux driver limitation, violating the core Device Tree principle that bindings describe hardware, not software capabilities. > -- > > --- Patch [1]: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: nuvoton,ma35d1-qspi: Disallow GPIO chip selects --- > commit 3aecb6991adf3696410ad69c99107c7d732fd078 > Author: Chi-Wen Weng <[email protected]> > > dt-bindings: spi: nuvoton,ma35d1-qspi: Disallow GPIO chip selects > > This commit updates the nuvoton,ma35d1-qspi binding to explicitly disallow > the cs-gpios property. The change is made because the current driver only > supports native chip selects, preventing the use of GPIO-based chip selects. > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/nuvoton,ma35d1-qspi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/nuvoton,ma35d1-qspi.yaml >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/nuvoton,ma35d1-qspi.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/nuvoton,ma35d1-qspi.yaml >> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ properties: >> maximum: 2 >> default: 2 >> >> + cs-gpios: false >> + > [Severity: Medium] > Does this restriction violate the device tree principle that bindings should > describe hardware rather than software capabilities? > > By explicitly disallowing cs-gpios in the properties block based on a current > Linux driver limitation, board designers who route a standard GPIO to a SPI > peripheral's chip select pin will be incorrectly prevented from describing > their actual physical board wiring. When running make dtbs_check on a board > device tree that uses cs-gpios for this controller, the schema will reject it. > > Should the hardware schema allow standard hardware properties like cs-gpios > even if the current software driver lacks support for them? > >> required: >> - compatible >> - reg Hi, Thanks for pointing this out. I agree that the binding should describe valid hardware and board wiring rather than the current driver limitation. I will send a v2 that keeps cs-gpios supported by the binding and instead enables GPIO descriptor-based chip-select handling in the MA35D1 QSPI driver. I will also keep active-high chip selects restricted to GPIO-based chip selects, since the controller's native chip selects currently support active-low operation only. Best regards, Chi-Wen