Re: [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match()
Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 20:14:18 +0300
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.infradead.lists.linux-i3c,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/08/2026 18:11, [email protected] wrote: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider: > > New issues: > - [High] Removal of the NULL check for `i3cdev->desc` introduces a guaranteed NULL pointer dereference in concurrent unregistration paths. Not valid > - [High] Unconditional access to `i3cdev->bus` in `i3c_device_match()` causes a Use-After-Free if the parent master controller has been freed. Makes no sense. > > Pre-existing issues: > - [High] Preexisting use-after-free race condition in AMD SBRMI (`sbrmi_i3c_probe`) accessing `i3cdev->desc` without holding the bus lock. > -- > > --- Patch [7]: [PATCH V3 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() --- > commit d088359c0cccb56067d426e92d0a49f24376de53 > Author: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> > > i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() > > This commit protects access to i3cdev->desc with the bus normal-use lock > in i3c_device_match() to prevent a use-after-free during concurrent > descriptor replacement. It also removes the NULL check for i3cdev->desc, > assuming the lock guarantees validity. > >> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c >> index 947ab3c681d5e..e7ea410078891 100644 >> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c >> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c >> @@ -347,8 +347,10 @@ static int i3c_device_match(struct device *dev, const struct device_driver *drv) >> i3cdev = dev_to_i3cdev(dev); >> i3cdrv = drv_to_i3cdrv(drv); >> >> - if (i3cdev->desc && i3cdev->desc->boardinfo) >> + i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(i3cdev->bus); > > [Severity: High] > Does accessing i3cdev->bus here risk a use-after-free if the parent master > controller has been freed? > > During unregistration, i3c_master_unregister() unregisters child devices, > and device_del() drops the child's reference to the parent by calling > put_device(parent). Once unregistration finishes, the parent platform device > unbinds and its devres frees the I3C master struct. > > If a concurrent bus_for_each_dev() iterator (such as from driver registration) That makes no sense. > holds a reference to the child device, the child outlives the parent. The > child's i3cdev->bus pointer would then remain pointing to the freed master > memory, leading to a use-after-free when acquiring the lock. > >> + if (i3cdev->desc->boardinfo) > > [Severity: High] > Could removing the NULL check for i3cdev->desc lead to a NULL pointer > dereference during concurrent unregistration? > > In i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs(), i3cdev->dev->desc = NULL; is set without > holding any bus locks. The DAA and registration paths are already blocked by master->shutting_down flag - refer i3c_master_shutdown() > > If a concurrent driver matching thread invokes i3c_device_match(), it can > proceed in parallel because driver_match_device() operates outside > device_lock(). The thread acquires the bus lock, but since unregistration > doesn't hold it, it could read desc as NULL and crash when accessing > i3cdev->desc->boardinfo. > >> static_addr_method = i3cdev->desc->boardinfo->static_addr_method; >> + i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(i3cdev->bus); >> >> /* >> * SETAASA-based devices need not always have a matching ID since > > [Severity: High] > This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a similar locking problem in > the AMD SBRMI driver. > > In drivers/misc/amd-sbi/rmi-i2c.c:sbrmi_i3c_probe(): > > if (I3C_PID_INSTANCE_ID(i3cdev->desc->info.pid) != 1) > > This dereferences i3cdev->desc without acquiring i3c_bus_normaluse_lock() > or using the safe i3c_device_get_info() API. > > Since probe runs holding device_lock(), it is not mutually exclusive with > the bus maintenance write-lock used for descriptor replacement in > __i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked(). If a device's address is concurrently > re-assigned during DAA hot-join, could probe dereference a freed descriptor > when it resumes? >