Re: [PATCH v8 05/17] KVM: x86: Avoid NTP f requency skew for KVM clock on 32-bit host
David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.kvm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7 August 2026 17:01:38 BST, Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> wrote: >+David (I realized I'm having a conversation between me, myself, and Sashiko) > >On Thu, Aug 06, 2026, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 05, 2026, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2026, [email protected] wrote: >> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> > > > index 3107878a6fe5d..8f469fd9863f9 100644 >> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> > > >> > > [ ... ] >> > > >> > > > @@ -915,13 +914,6 @@ static s64 get_kvmclock_base_ns(void) >> > > > /* Count up from boot time, but with the frequency of the raw clock. */ >> > > > return ktime_to_ns(ktime_add(ktime_get_raw(), pvclock_gtod_data.offs_boot)); >> > > >> > > [Severity: Low] >> > > Will reading the 64-bit pvclock_gtod_data.offs_boot without seqcount >> > > protection or data_race() annotations trigger KCSAN data race warnings on >> > > 32-bit systems? >> > > >> > > By removing the ktime_get_boottime_ns() fallback, this read now executes on >> > > 32-bit architectures where it compiles to two non-atomic 32-bit accesses. >> > > If a KVM vCPU thread calls get_kvmclock_base_ns() while a timer interrupt >> > > runs timekeeping_update(), it overwrites offs_boot. >> > > >> > > Even though the value only actually changes during suspend when the freezer >> > > subsystem guarantees vCPU threads are frozen (preventing functional tearing), >> > > overwriting the identical value concurrently with an unprotected read still >> > > introduces a formal C11 data race. >> > >> > Huh. And strictly speaking, 64-bit could tear the store/load. Stealing heavily >> > from ktime_mono_to_any(), this as a prep patch plus fixup (not yet tested)? >> >> LOL, hilarious. I was cherry-picking the rest of the series on top to run the >> tests, and discovered that "Compute kvmclock base without pvclock_gtod_data" >> does exactly that: uses ktime_mono_to_any() directly. So at least I went in the >> right direction? >> >> David, is there any reason that patch needs to be 25/36? AFAICT, it slots in >> very nicely before this patch. Then we don't need to do the below, because >> ktime_mono_to_any() already takes care of 32-bit. > >Same question for "KVM: x86: Use ktime_get_snapshot_id() for master clock". I >don't see any obvious dependencies in here: > > KVM: x86: Re-synchronize TSC after KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ > KVM: x86: Remove runtime Xen TSC frequency CPUID update > KVM: x86: Avoid redundant masterclock updates from multiple vCPUs > KVM: x86/xen: Prevent runstate times from becoming negative > KVM: x86: Avoid gratuitous global clock updates > KVM: x86: Factor out kvm_use_master_clock() > KVM: x86: Allow KVM master clock mode when TSCs are offset from each other > KVM: x86: Replace nr_vcpus_matched_tsc count with all_vcpus_matched_tsc bool > KVM: x86: Kill last_tsc_{nsec,write,offset} fields > KVM: x86: Improve synchronization in kvm_synchronize_tsc() > >And if I pull those in earlier, and grab these two (which AFICT also don't have >dependencies either): > > KVM: x86: Remove runtime Xen TSC frequency CPUID update > KVM: x86/xen: Prevent runstate times from becoming negative > >Then what's left fits nicely into two or three buckets: > > 1: Masterclock overhaul > 2. New uAPI and tests > >> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> > index b6e1dfd6db6a..57679d871581 100644 >> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> > @@ -921,7 +921,8 @@ static void update_pvclock_gtod(struct timekeeper *tk) >> > >> > vdata->wall_time_sec = tk->xtime_sec; >> > >> > - vdata->offs_boot = tk->offs_boot; >> > + /* Pairs with the READ_ONCE() in get_kvmclock_base_ns(). */ >> > + WRITE_ONCE(vdata->offs_boot, tk->offs_boot); >> > >> > write_seqcount_end(&vdata->seq); >> > } >> > @@ -929,7 +930,26 @@ static void update_pvclock_gtod(struct timekeeper *tk) >> > static s64 get_kvmclock_base_ns(void) >> > { >> > /* Count up from boot time, but with the frequency of the raw clock. */ >> > - return ktime_to_ns(ktime_add(ktime_get_raw(), pvclock_gtod_data.offs_boot)); >> > + struct pvclock_gtod_data *gtod = &pvclock_gtod_data; >> > + ktime_t raw = ktime_get_raw(); >> > + ktime_t now; >> > + >> > + /* >> > + * Synchronization with clock updates isn't required on 64-bit as only >> > + * one field is being consume >> > + * */ >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 >> > + now = ktime_add(raw, READ_ONCE(gtod->offs_boot)); >> > +#else >> > + unsigned int seq; >> > + >> > + do { >> > + seq = read_seqcount_begin(>od->seq); >> > + now = ktime_add(raw, *offset); >> > + } while (read_seqcount_retry(gtod->seq, seq)); >> > +#endif >> > + >> > + return ktime_to_ns(now); >> > } >> > >> > static uint32_t div_frac(uint32_t dividend, uint32_t divisor) (Home and on the phone after an insane week; full attention span might be limited until Monday). The only reason the ktime snapshot stuff is last in the series is because I did that work on the kernel's core timekeeping two years after the rest of the series, and it was still sitting at the tip branch at the time so I didn't want to make it a hard dependency for the kvmclock series. Now the timekeeping stuff is merged we can fold it all into the kvmclock series however we like.