Re: [PATCH v23 5/5] PCI/MSI: Enable memory decoding before restoring MSI-X messages

Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390
Message-ID <20260812220905.GA1082162@bhelgaas>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 05:07:58PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Missing error check on PCI_COMMAND read leads to permanent register corruption and unintended device enablement on transient PCI errors.

This does seem like a possible issue, but we do the same thing all
over the place, including in pci_intx_for_msi() just above. I don't
think checking for ~0 here will significantly reduce the chance of
problems.

> --
> 
> --- Patch [5]: [PATCH v23 5/5] PCI/MSI: Enable memory decoding before restoring MSI-X messages ---
> commit 6d8ddd25b8ed47c23845049339a3c29cd4e53440
> Author: Farhan Ali <[email protected]>
> 
> PCI/MSI: Enable memory decoding before restoring MSI-X messages
> 
> This commit temporarily enables the Memory bit in the Command register
> before writing MSI-X messages to prevent Unsupported Request errors.
> It then restores the original Command register state afterwards.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> > index 209373c92e9e1..79c7e84d314b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -879,6 +880,14 @@ void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	pci_msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, 0,
> >  				PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE | PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The restored device state may not have Memory decoding enabled
> > +	 * in the Command register. Since the MSI-X was enabled for the
> > +	 * device, enable Memory decoding before restoring MSI-X.
> > +	 */
> > +	pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
> > +	pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
> 
> [Severity: High]
> If the device is inaccessible or experiencing a transient error (e.g., an AER
> link reset), can this read fail and set cmd to 0xFFFF?
> 
> Looking at pci_read_config_word(), it uses PCI_SET_ERROR_RESPONSE() on failure:
> 
> int pci_read_config_word(const struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 *val)
> {
>         if (pci_dev_is_disconnected(dev)) {
>                 PCI_SET_ERROR_RESPONSE(val);
>                 return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
>         }
>         ...
> }
> 
> If cmd is set to 0xFFFF, the subsequent pci_write_config_word() will write
> 0xFFFF back to the Command register.
> 
> Does this unintentionally enable all device capabilities, including Bus
> Mastering (which could lead to rogue DMA) and SERR#? 
> 
> Should we check the return value of pci_read_config_word() before writing?
> 
> > +
> >  	write_msg = arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
> >  
> >  	scoped_guard (msi_descs_lock, &dev->dev) {
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -889,6 +898,7 @@ void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
> 
> [Severity: High]
> If cmd was populated with the error response 0xFFFF, does this write
> permanently commit the corrupted state back to the device?
> 
> >  	pci_msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL, 0);
> >  }
> 
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=5
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.