Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: VMX: Rename posted interrupt prefixes from "vmx" to "vt"
Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.kvm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, [email protected] wrote: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider: > - [Low] The function `vmx_needs_pi_wakeup()` was not renamed to `vt_needs_pi_wakeup()`. > - [Low] The shared inline API `__vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt()` was not renamed to `__vt_deliver_posted_interrupt()`. > - [Low] A comment inside `vt_can_use_vtd_pi()` references the old `vmx_pi_start_bypass()` function name. > -- I also missed vmx_handle_nmi() and __vmx_handle_ept_violation(). I'll also add a blurb in the changelog for patch 1 to explain that keeping the vmx_ prefix is intentional so that vt_op() doesn't require a one-line forwarder when CONFIG_KVM_INTEL_TDX=y.