Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: VMX: Rename posted interrupt prefixes from "vmx" to "vt"

Xiaoyao Li <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.kvm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/15/2026 1:02 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026,[email protected] wrote:
>> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
>> - [Low] The function `vmx_needs_pi_wakeup()` was not renamed to `vt_needs_pi_wakeup()`.
>> - [Low] The shared inline API `__vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt()` was not renamed to `__vt_deliver_posted_interrupt()`.
>> - [Low] A comment inside `vt_can_use_vtd_pi()` references the old `vmx_pi_start_bypass()` function name.
>> --
> I also missed vmx_handle_nmi() and __vmx_handle_ept_violation().

So for TDX VMDoS series, I need to rename __vmx_handle_notify() to 
vt_handle_notify() and extract handle_bus_lock_vmexit() from vmx.c to 
main.c as vt_handle_bus_lock_vmexit() or just inline function in common.h?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.