Re: [PATCH v3 09/12] rtc: rzn1: Use temporary variable for struct device
Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-rtc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aoQ5INLOtNELfXpH@ninjato> |
> Should rzn1_rtc_disable_hardware() use pm_runtime_put_sync() instead to > ensure the suspend completes before runtime PM is disabled? Sounds reasonable to me, what do you think?
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmqEOSAACgkQFA3kzBSg KbafAg/+MCgXVaHhq3ddk51Im5xzgcqbuC9YjNFX0D8+7HqPozGqmWOfxCVmJOZF PeaJyVcd+JF9e5+DH85exClAWl8s0p+ph2UWsuYVX9RH86ErOQJz4/lpaLVguc6K NrAizPCc8TnkI87dc4iSidArzVIpp4+2g7y/qCtX0GTP7qTS1vVcMY/THkO8pT05 djQPlQ1SJ+OwF6qgAK5KWd/ayiKgkqzCIIkpuIQYQa9S0Q5IjoI5HXE2d8oNtm6p 75neuPZGVuJtzosKB3SB/j+/fU0hjamtnnXppk5MQ9hCbkcSkLNpN4xk4iE2OcSd 4IeG9kobM/zj8CSFuBNfCT1aFepRHPBS3oxLvena9Sd8FjVXk8pWLKcI8vZEEoq3 I9NriTjIcPHJTq3AM0aygvetDf00+eMPAxwWGNFLqrWGncCqXyBpyuw6/4vsImSa 1xjD+Khfm7CdqAeqmtq/B4vrR9PIqgS357TeJ20kVEb88BX4nSiQVWn1us9mSPxJ a6gE2kaYdRKcEVTQbq5/smFzuOu8MR8SFsraRfeMk6f74tNOlWT7dPsf4EfRRfzU vdoUSh0UeKkG7wu6F3TZJpn/PO6NunAD+0yefyAzclMP2SmaVpUjH/p+FwIoYdzj INTb+V/qUf82I1atd2aPxp40/jim4MsRI2jZz0GEFliI5SVPaRY= =gHS+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----