Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] rtc: rzn1: Add support for Renesas RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs
Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-rtc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aoRB8CrV7ECOG33Y@ninjato> |
> Should we add match data to this compatible string to identify the variant > and explicitly reject probe with -EOPNOTSUPP if the clock configuration > would require the unsupported SUBU mode? Correct. Matches also my notes which say that this code 445 if (rate != 32768) 446 scmp_val = RZN1_RTC_CTL0_SLSB_SCMP; is wrong when we have a variant which has no SUBU support. Because in that case, we need to enable SCMP even for 32768Hz. So, yes, it is needed to mark which variant has SUBU (RZ/N1 only, likely forever) and bail out if no SUBU and no 'xtal'. The above code needs to check SUBU support, too.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmqEQfAACgkQFA3kzBSg KbasZxAAh+UdvDISQDbAVdcFM1MRSX2vJGNj7lp0i83uMUWWY2j1jmvZFA6PNjK/ P+QY1G7iHhU8Bv/xyTaYOuZFhucgjUKBJbf5Au5L3VUuGCiEB6g3Jk8doU2j4NXr TTJTAofOW5gDWLJNP5fFBACEp/STZxB9hr1wEz5sIJw/QTLAvDSVvkL2U5al24LQ lBDG10itHZjmMsdKnUcEEVXL8J3Gv/ZZPCJYrXwVfxxAOoxj5e5Wn5b6NWMfA5IV c0yTaUADCllXVk0D5HPGI2bAPx5DeLJSXsyghyYmK6sgLU2xHayJ7nlBz43XkKSt kc+1ahOuStTQ1B6CmMXlMAIwORoTtR/34HLCd6nTLd6sL7zOy40BFtJJsZM3gvhC 5Prwj/3sl95hadnxz0TFyemhxxnQfL+dUSSO2EpmlZDXduggo1YfsgUFO9xr4q3l BFelACcCjMSZpEO5L0CcviAqD5y/c7IK/9YdKehc72d1c0Mo6U8VkRdgVzAYPfCI UUKuRXJlKBBIOaR8QXO5mpZhkkpscmlQdTAQDUS9/sagEVDQcoBZfO0LxcpfOsmI JrX5sd6VC8A2/v5i9Bbe09u28nQLo8x8IJHNbI/pXsUQJRMQPfbVd5rvJVdimYCX EV+Ok4UoTxTACBDh19+ii/gUIfr4gww/0BCO7FxikBdBeL6grLg= =4UQo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----