Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Free the caches when GITS_BASER changes

Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,dev.linux.lists.kvmarm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:37:24 +0100,
Fuad Tabba <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sashiko, this one is real.
> 
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 at 07:57, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> >
> > Pre-existing issues:
> > - [High] Pre-existing race condition in ITS MMIO handler allows MSI injection while ITS is disabled due to a stale translation cache entry.
> > --
> >
> > --- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Free the caches when GITS_BASER changes ---
> > commit 98c89973da07ed23e9bd8348bfd2cf61333c4e66
> > Author: Fuad Tabba <[email protected]>
> >
> > KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Free the caches when GITS_BASER changes
> >
> > A guest that disables the ITS and changes GITS_BASER<n> with VALID still set
> > keeps the mapped devices and collections. This patch frees the list and
> > drops the translation cache whenever the stored value changes.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> > > index 9e782a4fea7e5..ab89b0138efd0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > @@ -1702,6 +1705,8 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm,
> > >                       vgic_its_free_collection_list(kvm, its);
> > >                       break;
> > >               }
> > > +             /* A concurrent injection may have cached a translation. */
> > > +             vgic_its_invalidate_cache(its);
> >
> > [Severity: High]
> > This is a pre-existing issue, but the commit message explicitly notes that
> > an injection can still cache an entry after the ITS is disabled.
> >
> > Is it possible for a subsequent MSI to trigger an unexpected LPI injection?
> 
> Yes, and it violates the spec: with GITS_CTLR.Enabled == 0 writes to
> GITS_TRANSLATER are ignored, so nothing should be injected.
> 
> It was reported in June [1] and is being worked on.

Is it? I'm worried this has stalled. I'll have a look...

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.