Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test verifier warning logging
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko,org.kernel.vger.bpf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP01T75a_-GkmOvQSjcsziSTEFYgn8X-_zn8haLvh4OhoJ0f1A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, 18 Apr 2026 at 19:45, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s): > - [Medium] The custom `libbpf_print_cb` unconditionally buffers all log levels into a fixed 4096-byte buffer, which will inevitably overflow during skeleton load and silently drop the expected verifier warnings. > -- > > commit 602c54794881684bfce8f29591c7e680ab7d51fe > Author: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> > > selftests/bpf: Test verifier warning logging > > This commit adds test coverage for explicit verifier warning logging and > libbpf's default warning flush path while keeping the warning bit private > to the test. > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_implicit_args.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_implicit_args.c > > index 5e4793c9c29a0..f92a27d764557 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_implicit_args.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_implicit_args.c > > @@ -4,7 +4,99 @@ > > #include <test_progs.h> > > #include "kfunc_implicit_args.skel.h" > > > > +#define TEST_BPF_LOG_LEVEL_WARN (1U << 4) > > + > > +static size_t libbpf_log_pos; > > +static char libbpf_log_buf[4096]; > > +static bool libbpf_log_error; > > + > > +static int libbpf_print_cb(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *fmt, va_list args) > > +{ > > + int emitted_cnt; > > + size_t left_cnt; > > + > > + (void)level; > > + > > + left_cnt = sizeof(libbpf_log_buf) - libbpf_log_pos; > > + emitted_cnt = vsnprintf(libbpf_log_buf + libbpf_log_pos, left_cnt, fmt, args); > > + if (emitted_cnt < 0 || emitted_cnt + 1 > left_cnt) { > > + libbpf_log_error = true; > > + return 0; > > + } > > Since libbpf generates a high volume of LIBBPF_DEBUG and LIBBPF_INFO messages > during object load, will this unconditionally buffer all log levels and overflow > the 4096-byte buffer before the load completes? > > If the buffer overflows, libbpf_log_error becomes true and subsequent messages > (including the expected verifier warnings flushed at the end of the load) will > be discarded. > > Should this callback filter out non-warning levels to avoid filling the buffer > too quickly? Perhaps, I will check and adjust if necessary. > > [ ... ] > > > +static void test_default_warning_flush(void) > > +{ > > + libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_cb = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_cb); > > + struct kfunc_implicit_args *skel = NULL; > > + int err; > > + > > + libbpf_log_pos = 0; > > + libbpf_log_buf[0] = '\0'; > > + libbpf_log_error = false; > > + > > + skel = kfunc_implicit_args__open(); > > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open")) > > + goto cleanup; > > + > > + select_legacy_impl_prog(skel); > > + > > + err = kfunc_implicit_args__load(skel); > > + ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_load"); > > + ASSERT_FALSE(libbpf_log_error, "libbpf_log_error"); > > Will this assertion predictably fail due to the buffer overflow mentioned > above? No, it's a non-common case. > > > + ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(libbpf_log_buf, "-- BEGIN PROG LOAD WARNINGS --"), "warn_banner"); > > + ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(libbpf_log_buf, > > + "uses deprecated kfunc bpf_kfunc_implicit_arg_legacy_impl()"), > > + "warn_msg"); > > + ASSERT_NULL(strstr(libbpf_log_buf, "-- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --"), "no_verbose_log"); > > + > > +cleanup: > > + kfunc_implicit_args__destroy(skel); > > + libbpf_set_print(old_print_cb); > > +} > > -- > Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=4