Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf test: fix sys_enter_openat event test for musl
Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:49:37AM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s): > - [Medium] The updated bitwise check `(tp_flags & flags) != flags` fails to verify the `O_RDONLY` access mode and permits arbitrary unrelated flags, severely weakening the test. > -- > > commit 0700122c98ba7f263a329cd8f9fbeef95b67603e > Author: Martin Kaiser <[email protected]> > > perf test: fix sys_enter_openat event test for musl > > This commit updates the sys_enter_openat test to allow additional flags in the > captured event. It replaces the strict equality check with a bitwise mask check > to accommodate the O_LARGEFILE flag implicitly added by musl libc. > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c b/tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c > > --- a/tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c > > [ ... ] > > > @@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ static int test__syscall_openat_tp_fields(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused > > > > tp_flags = evsel__intval(evsel, &sample, "flags"); > > perf_sample__exit(&sample); > > - if (flags != tp_flags) { > > + /* C library wrapper may set additional flags */ > > + if ((tp_flags & flags) != flags) { > > Does this check still verify the O_RDONLY access mode? > > Since O_RDONLY is defined as 0, the flags variable evaluates to exactly > O_DIRECTORY. This means the condition functionally becomes > (tp_flags & O_DIRECTORY) != O_DIRECTORY. > > Does this unintentionally permit other access modes like O_WRONLY or O_RDWR, > and ignore other unrelated flags as long as O_DIRECTORY is set? I think it's ok for tp_flags to have more flags. Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Thanks, Namhyung > > > pr_debug("%s: Expected flags=%#x, got %#x\n", > > __func__, flags, tp_flags); > > goto out_delete_evlist; > > -- > Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=2