Re: [PATCH RESEND] perf/lock: Fix non-atomic max/time and min_time updates in contention_data

Hi Namhyung,

On Wed, 6 May 2026 at 04:05, Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 05:23:37PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> > - [Low] The use of `__sync_val_compare_and_swap` introduces a compiler dependency on BPF ISA v3, breaking the `perf` tool build on older toolchains.
> > --
> >
> > commit 30820839a2cfcfa987fbc2e0f79fa0e2f2cf0dc3
> > Author: Suchit Karunakaran <[email protected]>
> >
> > perf/lock: Fix non-atomic max/time and min_time updates in contention_data
> >
> > This commit replaces bare conditional assignments with a bpf_loop()-based CAS
> > retry loop to fix non-atomic updates of max_time and min_time.
> >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
> > > index 96e7d853b9edf..5c8431be674ac 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
> > [ ... ]
> > > @@ -486,16 +493,49 @@ static inline s32 get_owner_stack_id(u64 *stacktrace)
> > >     return -1;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static long cas_min_max_cb(u64 idx, void *arg)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct cas_ctx *ctx = arg;
> > > +
> > > +   if (!ctx->max_done) {
> > > +           u64 old_max = ctx->data->max_time;
> > > +           if (old_max >= ctx->duration) {
> > > +                   ctx->max_done = 1;
> > > +           } else {
> > > +                   u64 r = __sync_val_compare_and_swap(
> > > +                           &ctx->data->max_time, old_max, ctx->duration);
> >
> > Does this cause build failures on older toolchains?
> >
> > The built-in __sync_val_compare_and_swap lowers to the BPF_CMPXCHG
> > instruction, which requires BPF CPU v3 (-mcpu=v3).
>
> Hmm.. this looks like a real concern.  We could add -mcpu=v3 to the
> compiler option, but then there would be compatibility issues with old
> kernels.  It seems it's added in v5.1 kernel and the oldest longterm
> support kernel version is 5.10.  So I think it's fine to add it.
>
> Could you please update the build flag as well?  It can be a separate
> commit.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
> >

Sure, I'll send a patch for that as well.