RE: [PATCH v6 net-next 05/15] net: enetc: add support for the "Add" operation to VLAN filter table

CC netdev to avoid the same comments

> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
> > issue(s) to
> > consider:
> > - [Low] Missing dummy implementation for `ntmp_vft_add_entry` when
> > `CONFIG_NXP_NETC_LIB` is disabled.
> > --
> >
> > commit 5e0769b9fed651ba9fec062f5b68e9fec7739814
> > Author: Wei Fang <[email protected]>
> >
> > net: enetc: add support for the "Add" operation to VLAN filter table
> >
> > This commit adds support for the Add operation to the VLAN filter
> > table for the enetc switch driver. It introduces the
> > ntmp_vft_add_entry helper function to facilitate adding entries using the
> table management protocol.
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/ntmp.h b/include/linux/fsl/ntmp.h
> > > index 4cfff835954e5..3672e0dc7726b 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/fsl/ntmp.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/fsl/ntmp.h
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > @@ -125,6 +147,8 @@ int ntmp_fdbt_delete_entry(struct ntmp_user
> > > *user,
> > u32 entry_id);
> > >  int ntmp_fdbt_search_port_entry(struct ntmp_user *user, int port,
> > >  				u32 *resume_entry_id,
> > >  				struct fdbt_entry_data *entry);
> > > +int ntmp_vft_add_entry(struct ntmp_user *user, u16 vid,
> > > +		       const struct vft_cfge_data *cfge);
> > >  #else
> > >  static inline int ntmp_init_cbdr(struct netc_cbdr *cbdr, struct device *dev,
> > >  				 const struct netc_cbdr_regs *regs)
> >
> > Does this need a dummy implementation for ntmp_vft_add_entry() in the
> > #else block?
> >
> > Other functions in this file have a static inline stub when
> > CONFIG_NXP_NETC_LIB is disabled. Without a stub here, configurations
> > where the caller is built but the library is not might encounter build
> > failures due to an undefined reference or implicit declaration.
> >
> 
> No need to add a dummy implementation for ntmp_vft_add_entry(), this
> function is only called by NETC switch driver, and the driver will select
> NXP_NETC_LIB. So
> ntmp_vft_add_entry() is always defined if NETC switch driver is built.
> 
> This is a false positive, please ignore it.