Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/5] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add clear_blackbox debugfs entry
"Abdurrahman Hussain" <[email protected]> Tue, 12 May 2026 01:27:35 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko,org.kernel.vger.linux-hwmon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon May 11, 2026 at 5:52 PM PDT, sashiko-bot wrote: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: > - [High] The debugfs write handler `adm1266_clear_blackbox_write` performs an I2C transaction without acquiring the required hardware monitoring locks, violating hwmon subsystem guidelines. > -- > > commit ab9c19373562d58415e28511b037545cfd278c2a > Author: Abdurrahman Hussain <[email protected]> > Subject: hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add clear_blackbox debugfs entry > > This commit adds a debugfs entry to clear the ADM1266 blackbox buffer by > issuing a block-write command to the device. This is needed when the > device operates in single-recording mode to preserve fault history. > >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c >> index 7b8433226176f..31aefa8fc75f5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c >> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c > > [ ... ] > >> +static ssize_t adm1266_clear_blackbox_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf, >> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos) >> +{ >> + struct i2c_client *client = file->private_data; >> + u8 payload[2] = { 0xFE, 0x00 }; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_block_data(client, ADM1266_READ_BLACKBOX, >> + sizeof(payload), payload); > > Does this I2C block write need to be protected by hwmon_lock() and > hwmon_unlock()? > > The hardware monitoring subsystem guidelines require drivers to implement > locking for attributes registered outside of the core registration functions, > such as debugfs entries. > > Without these locks, could this write operation race with other multi-record > transactions? For example, if this clear command is interleaved while > adm1266_nvmem_read_blackbox() is iterating through multiple records, might > it corrupt the read sequence? > >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + return count; >> +} Good catch! Will use pmbus_lock_interruptible() in v3.