Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/5] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add clear_blackbox debugfs entry
Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Tue, 12 May 2026 06:55:18 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko,org.kernel.vger.linux-hwmon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/12/26 03:20, Abdurrahman Hussain wrote: > On Tue May 12, 2026 at 2:19 AM PDT, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 5/12/26 01:27, Abdurrahman Hussain wrote: >>> On Mon May 11, 2026 at 5:52 PM PDT, sashiko-bot wrote: >>>> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: >>>> - [High] The debugfs write handler `adm1266_clear_blackbox_write` performs an I2C transaction without acquiring the required hardware monitoring locks, violating hwmon subsystem guidelines. >>>> -- >>>> >>>> commit ab9c19373562d58415e28511b037545cfd278c2a >>>> Author: Abdurrahman Hussain <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add clear_blackbox debugfs entry >>>> >>>> This commit adds a debugfs entry to clear the ADM1266 blackbox buffer by >>>> issuing a block-write command to the device. This is needed when the >>>> device operates in single-recording mode to preserve fault history. >>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c >>>>> index 7b8433226176f..31aefa8fc75f5 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c >>>> >>>> [ ... ] >>>> >>>>> +static ssize_t adm1266_clear_blackbox_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf, >>>>> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + struct i2c_client *client = file->private_data; >>>>> + u8 payload[2] = { 0xFE, 0x00 }; >>>>> + int ret; >>>>> + >>>>> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_block_data(client, ADM1266_READ_BLACKBOX, >>>>> + sizeof(payload), payload); >>>> >>>> Does this I2C block write need to be protected by hwmon_lock() and >>>> hwmon_unlock()? >>>> >>>> The hardware monitoring subsystem guidelines require drivers to implement >>>> locking for attributes registered outside of the core registration functions, >>>> such as debugfs entries. >>>> >>>> Without these locks, could this write operation race with other multi-record >>>> transactions? For example, if this clear command is interleaved while >>>> adm1266_nvmem_read_blackbox() is iterating through multiple records, might >>>> it corrupt the read sequence? >>>> >>>>> + if (ret < 0) >>>>> + return ret; >>>>> + >>>>> + return count; >>>>> +} >>> >>> Good catch! >>> >>> Will use pmbus_lock_interruptible() in v3. >>> >> >> There is also "guard(pmbus_lock)(client);" or "scoped_guard(pmbus_lock, client) { ... }". >> Guenter > > Thanks for the tip! Does that mean you're ok with losing the > interruptibility, since there's no DEFINE_GUARD_COND for interruptible > variant? > Yes. If anything, I'd like to drop the _interruptible variant entirely. I only keep it for historic reasons. Guenter