Re: Sashiko email policy precedence

"Danilo Krummrich" <[email protected]> writes:

> On Mon Jun 1, 2026 at 11:46 AM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> Flagging something as wide list seems rather simple [1], the tristate [2] would
>> work as well, but seems a bit more complicated and potentially requires
>> adjusting the existing policies.
>
> Roman, any preference on either of those or something else?

Sorry for being late to the party.

Yeah, the tricky balance here is that there are people who want more
sashiko reviews and there are people who are quite vocal against it.

And I don't want to over-complicate the setup, I'm afraid it will be
just a constant source of disagreement.

One option, is to switch from mailing list granularity to the
MAINTAINERS-entry granularity. Wdyt?

I don't think I have a perfect model in my head which will cover all
edge cases, tbh. I personally think that reply_to_author + cc the main
mailing list should work pretty much everywhere, but it looks like there
are other opinions as well.

Thanks