Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/portdrv: Allow probing even without child services
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:15:26 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sashiko,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260715221526.GA117606@bhelgaas> |
[+cc David, Mani] On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 05:12:19PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 11:30:22PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: > > - [High] Moving `pci_set_master()` after child device registration causes child drivers to probe with Bus Mastering disabled, risking permanently lost MSI/MSI-X interrupts. > > -- > > > > commit 9b851bf8faf271ab0b2daad51bfd51f89a1e87d4 > > Author: Brian Norris <[email protected]> > > > > PCI/portdrv: Allow probing even without child services > > > > This commit modifies the PCIe port driver to allow probe to succeed even > > if no child services are available. This ensures the port can still be > > configured for runtime PM and low power modes on systems that only have > > certain port services available or lack legacy INTx interrupts. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/nyada24tqwlkzdceyoxbzitzygvp4elvj5oajnqdwb33xkcdwk@76vnrx45fsfd/ > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c > > > @@ -343,7 +343,6 @@ static int pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev) > > > if (!capabilities) > > > return 0; > > > > > > - pci_set_master(dev); > > > /* > > > * Initialize service irqs. Don't use service devices that > > > * require interrupts if there is no way to generate them. > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > /* Allocate child services if any */ > > > - status = -ENODEV; > > > - nr_service = 0; > > > for (i = 0; i < PCIE_PORT_DEVICE_MAXSERVICES; i++) { > > > int service = 1 << i; > > > if (!(capabilities & service)) > > > continue; > > > - if (!pcie_device_init(dev, service, irqs[i])) > > > - nr_service++; > > > + pcie_device_init(dev, service, irqs[i]); > > > } > > > - if (!nr_service) > > > - goto error_cleanup_irqs; > > > > > > - return 0; > > > + pci_set_master(dev); > > > > Does moving pci_set_master() after the pcie_device_init() loop > > risk dropping MSI/MSI-X interrupts during child driver probes? > > > > The pcie_device_init() function calls device_register(), which > > synchronously invokes the probe routines of child service drivers > > like pciehp or aer. During probe, these child drivers configure > > the hardware and enable their interrupts. > > > > Because PCIe MSI and MSI-X interrupts are memory write > > transactions, they require the Bus Master Enable (BME) bit to be > > set in the PCI Command Register. > > > > If a hardware event occurs immediately after the child driver > > unmasks the interrupt but before pci_set_master(dev) is called, > > will the hardware attempt to send an MSI and drop the memory write > > because BME is 0? > > > > Since PCIe interrupts are edge-triggered messages, could these > > dropped interrupts result in permanently missed hotplug events or > > cause hardware error handling regressions? > > Ha, that's funny. It's all a great question I think, and that's > pretty much what I asked Bjorn here when he suggested moving this: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > He seems to think it's not a problem: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260220164046.GA3528004@bhelgaas/ > > but I'm frankly not very convinced. I think it's perfectly possible > that a child service will try to enable MSI, the device will try to > write, and those writes will be dropped, producing a missing > interrupt. I think you're right that if we move the pci_set_master() after pcie_device_init(), there is a window where MSIs could be dropped. If pcie_portdrv_probe() is called after pcie_portdrv_init() registers service drivers (which would certainly happen if a port is hot-added) the service .probe() will be called inside pcie_device_init(), so BME must be set before that. pcie_portdrv_init # device_initcall pcie_init_services pcie_aer_init pcie_port_service_register driver_register pcie_portdrv_probe pcie_port_device_register pci_set_master # current location pcie_init_service_irqs # set generic PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE for (i = 0; ...) pcie_device_init device_register aer_probe # set PCI_ERR_ROOT_CMD_COR_EN interrupt enable > Bjorn, what do you think? Personally, I'd go back to something > closer to v2, where we enable mastering before initializing > children. Yes, I agree. What do you think of the patch below? It's fairly similar to your v2. diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c index 69283cd04a78..6912743df767 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int pcie_device_init(struct pci_dev *pdev, int service, int irq) * Allocate the port extension structure and register services associated with * the port. */ -static int pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev) +static void pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev) { int status, capabilities, i, nr_service; int irqs[PCIE_PORT_DEVICE_MAXSERVICES]; @@ -336,12 +336,12 @@ static int pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev) /* Enable PCI Express port device */ status = pci_enable_device(dev); if (status) - return status; + return; /* Get and check PCI Express port services */ capabilities = get_port_device_capability(dev); if (!capabilities) - return 0; + return; pci_set_master(dev); /* @@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ static int pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev) } /* Allocate child services if any */ - status = -ENODEV; nr_service = 0; for (i = 0; i < PCIE_PORT_DEVICE_MAXSERVICES; i++) { int service = 1 << i; @@ -368,16 +367,16 @@ static int pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev) if (!pcie_device_init(dev, service, irqs[i])) nr_service++; } + if (!nr_service) goto error_cleanup_irqs; - return 0; + return; error_cleanup_irqs: pci_free_irq_vectors(dev); error_disable: pci_disable_device(dev); - return status; } typedef int (*pcie_callback_t)(struct pcie_device *); @@ -698,9 +697,7 @@ static int pcie_portdrv_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) pcie_link_rcec(dev); - status = pcie_port_device_register(dev); - if (status) - return status; + pcie_port_device_register(dev); pci_save_state(dev);