Re: [PATCH v3] of: property: add i2c-parent to fw_devlink supplier bindings

Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.sashiko,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CACRMN=cXSy0ZYH78sQ88QKkwYtbE768kh=KzRhkYYCO4SX2m-Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 8:33 PM Abdurrahman Hussain
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Platform-device i2c muxes (i2c-mux-reg, i2c-mux-gpio, ...) reference
> the bus they multiplex with an i2c-parent phandle and hold a reference
> on that adapter from probe until remove. Unlike muxes that are clients
> on the parent bus, they live outside the adapter's device hierarchy,
> so nothing orders their teardown against it: if the adapter's device
> is unbound first — e.g. while reverting a device-tree overlay whose
> changeset attached the mux nodes before the controller nodes —
> i2c_del_adapter() blocks forever in
> wait_for_completion(&adap->dev_released), waiting for a reference that
> is only dropped later in the same teardown sequence.
>
> Teach fw_devlink about i2c-parent so the core creates the
> corresponding device links: consumers are unbound before the parent
> adapter's device, and probe ordering no longer needs -EPROBE_DEFER.
>
> A plain DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP() cannot be used because the property has
> two incompatible layouts: the i2c mux bindings hold a list of bare
> phandles (i2c-demux-pinctrl takes several), while toshiba,tc9563 holds
> a single phandle followed by an i2c slave-address cell. The two forms
> are indistinguishable in the flattened tree, and a 0-cell parse of the
> tc9563 form would read the slave address as a phandle, linking the
> consumer to whatever node happens to carry that phandle value. Use a
> custom parser that only takes entry 0 for toshiba,tc9563 nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abdurrahman Hussain <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix the tc9563 compatible check: match "pci1179,0623" (the actual
>   binding compatible) instead of "toshiba,tc9563", which never matched
>   and let the bare-phandle parser misread the i2c slave-address cell as
>   a phandle (Sashiko AI review)
> - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260815-b4-of-property-add-i2c-parent-v2-1-239c6da9e097@nexthop.ai
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use a custom parser instead of DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP: toshiba,tc9563 puts
>   an i2c slave-address cell after the phandle, which a 0-cell parse
>   would misread as a phandle (Sashiko AI review, Rob). Kept the full

A bit of a tangent, is this a bug in Sashiko bot?
It just dropped me from the reply in the v1 patch set. Any idea why?

-Saravana

>   phandle-list parse for other users since i2c-demux-pinctrl takes
>   several parents; only tc9563 is limited to entry 0
> - Move the Signed-off-by into the commit message proper; v1 had it below
>   the '---' cutter line where it would be dropped on apply
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260813-b4-of-property-add-i2c-parent-v1-1-a2487e920ce1@nexthop.ai
>
> To: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> To: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
>  drivers/of/property.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 72cf12907de0..9bf3bc0a5f38 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -1471,6 +1471,22 @@ static struct device_node *parse_gpio_compat(struct device_node *np,
>         return sup_args.np;
>  }
>
> +static struct device_node *parse_i2c_parent(struct device_node *np,
> +                                           const char *prop_name, int index)
> +{
> +       if (strcmp(prop_name, "i2c-parent"))
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       /* tc9563 (pci1179,0623) is <phandle addr>; every other user is bare phandles */
> +       if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "pci1179,0623")) {
> +               if (index)
> +                       return NULL;
> +               return of_parse_phandle(np, prop_name, 0);
> +       }
> +
> +       return of_parse_phandle(np, prop_name, index);
> +}
> +
>  static struct device_node *parse_interrupts(struct device_node *np,
>                                             const char *prop_name, int index)
>  {
> @@ -1562,6 +1578,7 @@ static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = {
>         { .parse_prop = parse_resets, },
>         { .parse_prop = parse_leds, },
>         { .parse_prop = parse_backlight, },
> +       { .parse_prop = parse_i2c_parent, },
>         { .parse_prop = parse_panel, },
>         { .parse_prop = parse_msi_parent, },
>         { .parse_prop = parse_pses, },
>
> ---
> base-commit: d58772d8520c7ef247c4b95c9bd76d3a25da9ff5
> change-id: 20260813-b4-of-property-add-i2c-parent-168c6d7f1934
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Abdurrahman Hussain <[email protected]>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.