Re: [PATCH 06/12] sched_ext: Fix proxy-exec race in consume_remote_task()
[email protected] Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:51:28 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sched-ext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [High] task_can_move_from_locked_rq() fails to check if the task is the active donor on the source runqueue under proxy execution. -- --- Patch [6]: [PATCH 06/12] sched_ext: Fix proxy-exec race in consume_remote_task() --- commit 681e47b7800ef6cd6756031dfb833542e391c7df Author: Andrea Righi <[email protected]> sched_ext: Fix proxy-exec race in consume_remote_task() This patch addresses a proxy execution race where a task's state can change without clearing holding_cpu. It introduces task_can_move_from_locked_rq() to recheck the on-CPU and migration-disabled states after switching to the source runqueue lock. If the state changed, the task is requeued on the global DSQ instead of aborting the BPF scheduler. > diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c > index 30d5965d09108..b5fd91d9bca4f 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c [ ... ] > @@ -2432,6 +2429,28 @@ static bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct scx_sched *sch, > return true; > } > > +/* > + * Proxy execution can change @p's execution and migration-disabled state > + * without touching its DSQ entry or clearing holding_cpu. Check those states > + * with @p's rq locked. Without proxy execution, the holding_cpu handshake is > + * sufficient and this must not affect the existing migration path. > + */ > +static bool task_can_move_from_locked_rq(struct task_struct *p) > +{ > + struct rq *src_rq = task_rq(p); > + > + lockdep_assert_rq_held(src_rq); > + > + if (!sched_proxy_exec()) > + return true; > + > + /* @p may be rq->curr under another task's proxy scheduling context. */ > + if (task_on_cpu(src_rq, p)) > + return false; > + [Severity: High] Is it possible for the active scheduling context (the donor) to be migrated here? When a task blocks on a mutex and becomes a proxy donor, it is retained on the runqueue (p->on_rq == 1) without being dequeued. put_prev_task_scx() sees SCX_TASK_QUEUED and enqueues this blocked task onto a DSQ. When another CPU attempts to consume from this DSQ, consume_remote_task() invokes this new task_can_move_from_locked_rq(). Since the donor is blocked, task_on_cpu(src_rq, p) evaluates to false. Without a check for task_current_donor(src_rq, p), could this return true and allow move_remote_task_to_local_dsq() to migrate the active donor, corrupting the proxy execution PI chain? > + return !is_migration_disabled(p); > +} -- Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=6