Re: manual merge of the cix tree with the arm-soc tree
"Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.soc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-next |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, May 8, 2026, at 12:52, Peter Chen wrote: > On 26-05-08 11:12:23, Thierry Reding wrote: >> >> It looks like the patch from the cix tree somehow partially landed in >> the arm-soc tree, even though it wasn't pulled yet. > > Hi Thierry, > > Sorry for about it. > > The above CIX things defconfig changes have reviewed near to Arm64 v7.1-rc1 > merge window close, so I have not sent pull-request for it, and it left > at cix's for-next tree. These two days, I rebased cix's for-next tree to > v7.1-rc2, and this patch is on top of it. Hi Peter, this is not a problem you caused, just something to be aware of when you send the pull request, and to check that Thierry made the right choice in resolving it. > Arnd, I deleted this patch at CIX next-tree. Would you please help queue it > in your soc/defconfig: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peter.chen/cix.git/ > branch: cix/defconfig Please send it as a normal pull request or patch to [email protected] so your change gets mered using the patchwork process. If you send it as a standalone patch, please make sure it applies on top of the soc/defconfig branch. A pull request is also fine, and that would normally be based on -rc1. Obviously this causes a merge conflict, which we will resolve during the merge. Arnd