Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add Laguna/Tensor G5 SoC and Frankel, Blazer & Mustang boards

Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:40:15 +0200
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.soc,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-samsung-soc,org.kernel.vger.linux-serial
Message-ID <20260724-raspberry-otter-of-perception-b8ef80@quoll>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 04:58:02PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 10:55:51AM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > This series adds initial basic support for Laguna (Tensor G5 SoC)
> > found in Frankel (Pixel 10), Blazer (Pixel 10 Pro) and Mustang (Pixel
> > 10 Pro XL) phones.
> 
> ...
> 
> >       arm64: defconfig: enable Tensor G5 SoC family
> 
> I'm not able to apply this one cleanly in my tree, although resolving
> the context conflict is trivial.
> 
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml  |  48 ++-
> >  .../bindings/serial/snps-dw-apb-uart.yaml          |   1 +
> >  MAINTAINERS                                        |   1 +
> >  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms                       |   8 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile                       |   1 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/google/Makefile                |   6 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/google/lga-blazer.dts          |  15 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/google/lga-frankel.dts         |  16 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/google/lga-mustang.dts         |  15 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/google/lga-pixel-common.dtsi   |  23 ++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/google/lga.dtsi                | 423 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig                       |   1 +
> >  12 files changed, 539 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > base-commit: 17c7841d09ee7d33557fd075562d9289b6018c90
> 
> I don't find this base commit in Linus's tree. I only found it in
> linux-next after fetching this hash directly -- it's a linux-next tag
> from 20260507? Seems like an odd old choice. Might be worth refreshing
> your base.
> 
> Apart from that and a small note on patch 4, it works for me:
> 
> Tested-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>

This does not apply to 60% of patches here. Really, you could just reply
to each email.

I expect incorrect tags won't be picked up.

Best regards,
Krzysztof