Re: [PATCH] rust: bug: fix `dead_code` warning in `warn_on!`

Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.soc,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.rust-for-linux,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <CANiq72kz2Ec119ZW2uiu0-RPHr=Zy5-WRA5tSOYk5it6PqpH2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 8, 2026 at 12:14 AM Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On arm and loongarch64, or under `CONFIG_BUG=n`, the upcoming SRCU
> abstractions from commit
>
>   59cf3a5bda61 ("rust: sync: add SRCU abstraction")
>
> use `warn_on!`, which in turn warns:
>
>     error: constant `WARN_ON_FLAGS` is never used
>        --> rust/kernel/bug.rs:126:19
>         |
>     126 |               const WARN_ON_FLAGS: u32 = $crate::bug::bugflag_taint($crate::bindings::TAINT_WARN);
>         |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>         |
>        ::: rust/kernel/sync/srcu.rs:106:12
>         |
>     106 |           if crate::warn_on!(
>         |  ____________-
>     107 | |             // SAFETY: By the type invariants, `self` contains a valid and pinned `struct srcu_struct`
>     108 | |             // and `srcu_readers_active()` only checks the active reader count.
>     109 | |             unsafe { bindings::srcu_readers_active(ptr) }
>     110 | |         ) {
>         | |_________- in this macro invocation
>         |
>         = note: `-D dead-code` implied by `-D warnings`
>         = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(dead_code)]`
>         = note: this error originates in the macro `crate::warn_on` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
>
> The reason is that `warn_flags!` discards both arguments in those cases,
> and so the `const` becomes unused. And since it is a macro, it went
> unnoticed so far.
>
> Thus fix it by simplifying by removing the `const`.
>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Fixes: dff64b072708 ("rust: Add warn_on macro")
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

Sorry, I forgot the Cc to Tomonori:

Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>

Cheers,
Miguel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.