Re:Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] dt-bindings: serial: add Ambarella CV75 UART
zl020895 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.soc,dev.linux.lists.mfd,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-serial |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the review. I did not copy a specific SoC UART binding. I followed the common 8250 OF properties (reg-shift / reg-io-width). I will drop them and hardcode the access in the driver. Best regards, Long Zhao At 2026-08-19 15:37:02, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 18/08/2026 12:31, Long Zhao via B4 Relay wrote: >> From: Long Zhao <[email protected]> >> >> Document the Ambarella CV75 on-chip UART controller binding for early >> console bring-up. The binding requires a single RCT clock input and >> fixed 32-bit register access via reg-shift and reg-io-width. >> >> Signed-off-by: Long Zhao <[email protected]> >> --- >> .../bindings/serial/ambarella,cv75-uart.yaml | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/ambarella,cv75-uart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/ambarella,cv75-uart.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..223c84bf460d >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/ambarella,cv75-uart.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/ambarella,cv75-uart.yaml# >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: Ambarella CV75 UART >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - Long Zhao <[email protected]> >> + >> +allOf: >> + - $ref: serial.yaml# >> + >> +properties: >> + compatible: >> + const: ambarella,cv75-uart >> + >> + reg: >> + maxItems: 1 >> + >> + interrupts: >> + maxItems: 1 >> + >> + clocks: >> + maxItems: 1 >> + >> + reg-shift: >> + const: 2 >> + >> + reg-io-width: >> + const: 4 > >Both properties are redundant. Const properties are pointless. Did you >take any existing code as example of this? If so which, so we can fix it? > >Best regards, >Krzysztof