Re: [PATCH 1/4] irqchip/sg2042-msi: Improve the logic of obtaining msi-ranges parameters

On 8/25/2025 3:33 PM, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 02:55:03PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>> From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>
>>
>> Get the arguments of msi-ranges by specifying nargs directly instead of
>> using nargs_prop. This only takes one step, unlike the previous two
>> steps to get the values of all the arguments.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Wang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c | 14 +++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c
>> index 3b13dbbfdb51..5249afd93b4a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c
>> @@ -276,17 +276,9 @@ static int sg2042_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	data->doorbell_addr = res->start;
>>   
>>   	ret = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(dev_fwnode(dev), "msi-ranges",
>> -						 "#interrupt-cells", 0, 0, &args);
>> +						 NULL, 3, 0, &args);
> Why using a fixed range here? I see no improvement. I think using #interrupt-cells
> is just OK.
Ok, I will revert this change.
> Regards,
> Inochi
>
>>   	if (ret) {
>> -		dev_err(dev, "Unable to parse MSI vec base\n");
>> -		return ret;
>> -	}
>> -	fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode);
>> -
>> -	ret = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(dev_fwnode(dev), "msi-ranges", NULL,
>> -						 args.nargs + 1, 0, &args);
>> -	if (ret) {
>> -		dev_err(dev, "Unable to parse MSI vec number\n");
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Unable to parse MSI Ranges\n");
>>   		return ret;
>>   	}
>>   
>> @@ -298,7 +290,7 @@ static int sg2042_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	data->irq_first = (u32)args.args[0];
>> -	data->num_irqs = (u32)args.args[args.nargs - 1];
>> +	data->num_irqs = (u32)args.args[2];
>>   
>>   	mutex_init(&data->msi_map_lock);
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>