Re: [PATCH 6/8] clk: sophgo: sg2042-pll: remove round_rate() in favor of determine_rate()
Chen Wang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sophgo,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <MAUPR01MB11072A23DEEA6F37D43DF0AFDFE3AA@MAUPR01MB11072.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
On 8/29/2025 8:38 AM, Brian Masney wrote: > This driver implements both the determine_rate() and round_rate() clk > ops, and the round_rate() clk ops is deprecated. When both are defined, > clk_core_determine_round_nolock() from the clk core will only use the > determine_rate() clk ops, so let's remove the round_rate() clk ops since > it's unused. > > The implementation of sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate() calls > sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate(), so this folds the two into a single > function. > > Reviewed-by: Chen Wang <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <[email protected]> Tested-by: Chen Wang <[email protected]> # Pioneerbox Thanks, Chen > --- > drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c | 26 +++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c b/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c > index e5fb0bb7ac4f97616f3b472fcab45e5729eb653e..110b6ee06fe4b61e89f3cbf2ce00eb03c078afb6 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c > @@ -346,37 +346,30 @@ static unsigned long sg2042_clk_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > return rate; > } > > -static long sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > - unsigned long req_rate, > - unsigned long *prate) > +static int sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > + struct clk_rate_request *req) > { > struct sg2042_pll_ctrl pctrl_table; > unsigned int value; > long proper_rate; > int ret; > > - ret = sg2042_get_pll_ctl_setting(&pctrl_table, req_rate, *prate); > + ret = sg2042_get_pll_ctl_setting(&pctrl_table, > + min(req->rate, req->max_rate), > + req->best_parent_rate); > if (ret) { > proper_rate = 0; > goto out; > } > > value = sg2042_pll_ctrl_encode(&pctrl_table); > - proper_rate = (long)sg2042_pll_recalc_rate(value, *prate); > + proper_rate = (long)sg2042_pll_recalc_rate(value, req->best_parent_rate); > > out: > - pr_debug("--> %s: pll_round_rate: val = %ld\n", > + pr_debug("--> %s: pll_determine_rate: val = %ld\n", > clk_hw_get_name(hw), proper_rate); > - return proper_rate; > -} > + req->rate = proper_rate; > > -static int sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > - struct clk_rate_request *req) > -{ > - req->rate = sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate(hw, min(req->rate, req->max_rate), > - &req->best_parent_rate); > - pr_debug("--> %s: pll_determine_rate: val = %ld\n", > - clk_hw_get_name(hw), req->rate); > return 0; > } > > @@ -417,14 +410,13 @@ static int sg2042_clk_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > > static const struct clk_ops sg2042_clk_pll_ops = { > .recalc_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_recalc_rate, > - .round_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate, > .determine_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate, > .set_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_set_rate, > }; > > static const struct clk_ops sg2042_clk_pll_ro_ops = { > .recalc_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_recalc_rate, > - .round_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate, > + .determine_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate, > }; > > /* >