Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: sophgo,sg2044-dwmac: add phy mode restriction
Inochi Amaoto <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sophgo,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <td7eseq6rmc3s2ecvcjyyyn5feawjmugzb4ihjyviquro7dv44@3dosfqam6h7h> |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 05:54:49PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 08:56:09AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 07:22:37PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 08:38:56AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > > > > As the ethernet controller of SG2044 and SG2042 only supports > > > > RGMII phy. Add phy-mode property to restrict the value. > > > > > > > > Also, since SG2042 has internal rx delay in its mac, make > > > > only "rgmii-txid" and "rgmii-id" valid for phy-mode. > > > > > > Should this have a fixes tag? > > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Although I add a fixes tag to the driver, I am not sure whether the > > binding requires it. But if it is required, I think it should be > > Kinda depends for bindings, amending a binding for completeness probably > doesn't need one but amending it to actually permit a functional > configuration does. This is somewhere in-between I suppose. If a driver > change is coming along with it which is likely to be backported, that'd > be a vote in favour of a fixes tag here too, so that the binding and > driver match in stable. > Thank you. It is helpful for me. And in this case, it is suitable to add this fixes tag. Regards, Inochi