Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] dt-bindings: net: sophgo,sg2044-dwmac: add phy mode restriction

Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.sophgo,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <20251114-apache-sprung-f1a29b873696@spud>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 08:44:15AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 08:38:03AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > As the ethernet controller of SG2044 and SG2042 only supports
> > RGMII phy. Add phy-mode property to restrict the value.
> > 
> > Also, since SG2042 has internal rx delay in its mac, make
> > only "rgmii-txid" and "rgmii-id" valid for phy-mode.
> > 
> > Fixes: e281c48a7336 ("dt-bindings: net: sophgo,sg2044-dwmac: Add support for Sophgo SG2042 dwmac")
> > Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
> 
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/net/sophgo,sg2044-dwmac.yaml     | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sophgo,sg2044-dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sophgo,sg2044-dwmac.yaml
> > index ce21979a2d9a..e8d3814db0e9 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sophgo,sg2044-dwmac.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sophgo,sg2044-dwmac.yaml
> > @@ -70,6 +70,25 @@ required:
> >  
> >  allOf:
> >    - $ref: snps,dwmac.yaml#
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            const: sophgo,sg2042-dwmac
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        phy-mode:
> > +          enum:
> 
> > +            - rgmii-rxid
> > +            - rgmii-id
> 
> Hi, Conor,
> 
> I have restricted the phy-mode with wrong mode here, it should be
> rgmii-rxid instead of rgmii-txid as the SG2042 always add rx delay
> in their mac. As this is more like a mistake for me when writing
> the binding, I keep you tag with the fix. If you need something
> further, please let me know.

Yeah that's fine chief. In general, if it is some hardware detail
that I couldn't possibly know was correct or incorrect without
reading the device's documentation then I probably don't care about
the binding change required for it when it's so minimal. Probably the
same goes for Rob and Krzysztof.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaRaFDAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0sHeAQCiwuHrj6CHOoRLG+GG2NyvoAYv/ledOLpXXMp9wFne6AD/ac6tU8Z1tAkf
gGLcZaOgphtF9IndUwUcVjxW0F1kDAM=
=Gnn9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.