Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: Add "b" ISA extension to existing devicetrees

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 4:42 AM Conor Dooley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:33:34AM +0800, Guodong Xu wrote:
> > Hi, Conor, Yixun
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 3:53 PM Yixun Lan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Guodong,
> > >
> > >
> > > On 15:45 Tue 13 Jan     , Guodong Xu wrote:
> > > > "b" is ratified (Apr/2024) much later than its components zba/zbb/zbs
> > > > (Jun/2021). With "b" added into riscv/extensions.yaml, a dependency
> > > > checking rule is now enforced, which requires that when zba, zbb, and zbs
> > > > are all specified, "b" must be added as well. Failing to do this will
> > > > cause dtbs_check schema check warnings.
> > > >
> > > > According to uabi.rst, as a single-letter extension, "b" should be added
> > > > after "c" in canonical order.
> > > >
> > > > Update existing devicetree files to conform to this rule. Line balancing
> > > > is performed where needed to improve readability.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/anlogic/dr1v90.dtsi     |   5 +-
> > > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-cpus.dtsi | 256 ++++++++++++++--------------
> > > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1.dtsi        |  32 ++--
> > > >  3 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)
> > > please have separated patch for different SoCs, so they can go via
> >
> > Understand your concern.
> >
> > > their own SoC tree.. thanks
> >
> > Conor, is it possible to take this as one patch instead?
> >
> > It fixes the same dtbs_check warnings from riscv/extensions.yaml across three
> > SoCs. Keeping them together maintains readability and clear tracking, IMHO.
> >
> > Happy to split if needed, but wanted to check first.
>
> I'd rather you split it, sorry.

Sure, will do.
Thank you both.

BR
Guodong Xu