Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] riscv: dts: Add "b" ISA extension to existing devicetrees

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 07:18:56AM +0800, Guodong Xu wrote:
> The RISC-V "b" (Bit-manipulation) extension was ratified in April 2024,
> much later than its component extensions zba/zbb/zbs (June 2021). Recent
> updates to the device tree bindings [2] enforce that when all three
> component extensions are present, "b" must also be specified. Related
> discussion can also be found in [1].
> 
> Patch 1 clarifies the ISA spec version for canonical ordering in uabi.rst.
> It is a trivial update, but can help readers reference the correct
> document version. Acked-by Paul Walmsley in v1.
> 
> Patch 2, 3 and 4 adds "b" after "c" in 3 different device tree files
> respectivly, anlogic, sophgo and spacemit, fixing the related dtbs_check
> warnings.
> 
> This patchset is based on top of linux-next, tag: next-20260109, and
> depends on [2].
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251230-imprison-sleet-6b5a1e26d34b@spud/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [2]
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Patch 1: Add Acked-by from Paul Walmsley.
> - Patch 2/3/4: These are splits from the v1 Patch 2. Split into three
>     different patches for each SoC.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <[email protected]>
> ---
> Guodong Xu (4):
>       Documentation: riscv: uabi: Clarify ISA spec version for canonical order
>       riscv: dts: anlogic: dr1v90: Add "b" ISA extension
>       riscv: dts: sophgo: sg2044: Add "b" ISA extension
>       riscv: dts: spacemit: k1: Add "b" ISA extension
> 
>  Documentation/arch/riscv/uabi.rst           |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/anlogic/dr1v90.dtsi     |   5 +-
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-cpus.dtsi | 256 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1.dtsi        |  32 ++--
>  4 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 31d167f54de93f14fa8e4bc6cbc4adaf7019fd94
> change-id: 20260113-adding-b-dtsi-148714533f07
> prerequisite-message-id: <[email protected]>
> prerequisite-patch-id: 0c859b4d131b3360875c795c6148c6176b55fb91
> prerequisite-patch-id: 2ed98dc1ab0f5ed923cc252415c345dc8caf6f17
> prerequisite-patch-id: 1be1a031763fac029076a768f012af31e455be66
> prerequisite-patch-id: 21bb8387c946e050910440e7a7622305d46d946d
> prerequisite-patch-id: f3bdc2c74b230663710086bd770a755d56cb8b9c
> prerequisite-patch-id: 1f162c02f8bdb5bbc8ce52ead4fcb76258f5c2b9
> prerequisite-patch-id: 76e1ff26c2f1fe4019cfa574942b568000e6ca1f
> prerequisite-patch-id: 77ddc9e5dc85495adc803cdc605bdda2ddc7fa47
> prerequisite-patch-id: a75c798383b46a14d40436357c769c3671184768
> prerequisite-patch-id: 781fc10dcae2c38c84c25bee887ef7474786dd36
> prerequisite-patch-id: 5be5d3e62aa73024bf9e1de6aad155be6d618f40

FWIW, this kind of prereq-patch-id stuff isn't really helpful, because I
don't think there's actually any dependencies on that work. It actually
trips up some parts of b4 that think they're needed.

I applied the Anlogic patch.

Thanks,
Conor.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaWk8TAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0qJXAP9BAi/JL4BUX4v3frtYl233RdCgXONa5Aa6sLWiDuldrAD+LoenY5vTUJMs
2yqbA1IH2zP1CkI5ysicbD/YYaQMtww=
=HTet
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----