Re: [PATCH V5] riscv: errata: Add ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE fixup

Drew Fustini <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Jun 2026 10:08:09 -0700
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.sophgo,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <ah8N+UThw4JnOdDb@x1>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 10:31:40AM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> From: "Guo Ren (Alibaba DAMO Academy)" <[email protected]>
> 
> The early version of XuanTie C910 core has a store merge buffer
> delay problem. The store merge buffer could improve the store queue
> performance by merging multi-store requests, but when there are not
> continued store requests, the prior single store request would be
> waiting in the store queue for a long time. That would cause
> significant problems for communication between multi-cores. This
> problem was found on sg2042 & th1520 platforms with the qspinlock
> lock torture test.
> 
> So appending a fence w.o could immediately flush the store merge
> buffer and let other cores see the write result.
> 
> This will apply the WRITE_ONCE errata to handle the non-standard
> behavior via appending a fence w.o instruction for WRITE_ONCE().
> 
> This problem is only observed on the sg2042 hardware platform by
> running the lock_torture test program for half an hour. The problem
> was not found in the user space application, because interrupt can
> break the livelock.
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Inochi Amaoto <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Han Gao <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Yao Zi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Chen Wang <[email protected]>
> Cc: Xiaoguang Xing <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren (Alibaba DAMO Academy) <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changelog
> 
> v5:
>  - Add Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> for asm/generic
>  - Add Reviewed-by: Inochi Amaoto <[email protected]>
>  - Rebase on v7.0

Hi Paul,

Han Gao (revy) let me know that there is now an errata entry for 'Writes
might stick in C910/C920v1 store buffer for too long' [1].

Does that address the concern you had about documenting the errata?

Thanks,
Drew

[1] https://github.com/revyos/xuantie-c900-bugs#writes-might-stick-in-c910c920v1-store-buffer-for-too-long