Re: SG2042 SATA (DMA?) issues
Niklas Cassel <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Jun 2026 11:14:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.sophgo,org.kernel.vger.linux-ide |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ah_wWLBK5OqBCFH1@ryzen> |
Hello Han, On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 08:19:32PM +0800, Han Gao wrote: > Hi, Michael > > Based on the new firmware with DMA coherence, we tested the following cases. > > Test method: > mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda1 > mount /dev/sda1 /mnt > f3write -e 128 /mnt > sync > f3read /mnt > > case1: > 2042pcie - asm2824 - jmb585: failed, csum failed. > case2: > 2042pcie - amd b650 bridge(prom 21) - asm1062: pass. > case3: > 2042pcie - asm2824 - amd b650 bridge(prom 21) - asm1062: pass > case4: > 2042pcie - asm2824 - jmb585 + kernel parameter libata.force=noncq: pass > > Based on the test results of the above four cases, > the problem is suspected to lie in the JMB585 chip itself. +linux-ide Original thread: https://lore.kernel.org/sophgo/ahu57vcS0oOFmCI9@mertle/ I interpret this as, before you added 'dma-coherent' to your PCIe controller device tree node: Sophgo SG2042 PCIe + ASM2824 + JMB585 worked fine, without any libata.force=noncq kernel parameter which disables NCQ. After adding 'dma-coherent' to your PCIe controller device tree node: Sophgo SG2042 PCIe + ASM2824 + JMB585 no longer works fine, and you need to disable NCQ to not get filesystem corruption. If this was a problem with the JMB585 chip, why did it work fine to run with NCQ enabled before you did firmware changes + added 'dma-coherent' to your PCIe controller device tree node? Disabling NCQ will significantly reduce the drive performance. Kind regards, Niklas