Re: [PATCH net-next v11 1/7] dt-bindings: phy: document the serdes PHY on sa8255p

Vinod Koul <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Jun 2026 15:53:16 +0530
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.sophgo,dev.linux.lists.imx,dev.linux.lists.linux-sunxi,org.infradead.lists.linux-amlogic,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <akOZFIowVvprnAMf@vaman>
On 29-06-26, 16:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Russell King asked me to put the PHY logic for SCMI pm domains into the PHY
> > driver instead of the MAC driver where it was previously. Instead of cramming
> > both HLOS and firmware handling into the same driver, I figured it makes more
> > sense to have a dedicated, cleaner driver as the two share very little code (if
> > any).
> 
> I think you are mixing up DT bindings and driver implementation?

Should the bindings change if we have different driver and firmware
implementations? Isn't binding supposed to be agnostic of
implementations..?

-- 
~Vinod