[SPDK] Re: Some doubts about spdk attach nvme device
Cao, Gang <gang.cao at intel.com> Tue, 04 Jan 2022 06:36:47 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.spdk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <PH0PR11MB5014DF766D251C4D9F889597834A9@PH0PR11MB5014.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> |
What's the major functionalities of Process C? Is it just for control path management? If it is for control path management, maybe you could try to use "CUSE" support and get the NVMe devices from Process A and B. Refer to https://spdk.io/doc/nvme.html, search "Enabling cuse support for NVMe" -----Original Message----- From: xu_zhaoqian(a)163.com <xu_zhaoqian(a)163.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 14:29 To: spdk(a)lists.01.org Subject: [SPDK] Re: Some doubts about spdk attach nvme device I know what you mean, but now process A and process B must be primary, because their huge page files need to be isolated from each other. so the shm_id of process A and process B are now different,this cannot be modified. _______________________________________________ SPDK mailing list -- spdk(a)lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to spdk-leave(a)lists.01.org