Re: [moderation/CI] Re: vsock/virtio: fix memory leak in virtio_transport_recv_listen

Pimyn Girgis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.syzbot
Message-ID <CAJWNTGyLasZLp5b9LUUWydR5R0jNo20O-uwXwXqNX=F_N=gzYw@mail.gmail.com>
#syz upstream


On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 3:33 AM syzbot ci
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> syzbot ci has tested the following series
>
> [v1] vsock/virtio: fix memory leak in virtio_transport_recv_listen
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
> * [PATCH] vsock/virtio: fix memory leak in virtio_transport_recv_listen
>
> and found the following issue:
> possible deadlock in virtio_transport_recv_listen
>
> Full report is available here:
> https://ci.syzbot.org/series/76f40e62-5a21-46d4-a636-10f0ec9c5040
>
> ***
>
> possible deadlock in virtio_transport_recv_listen
>
> tree:      net-next
> URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git
> base:      bfa3d89cc15c09f7d1581c834a5ed725189ec19f
> arch:      amd64
> compiler:  Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
> config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/5a94a424-94b1-4b1e-8b06-74d59933368f/config
> syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/a8224003-11b3-4232-a635-6755ad892149/syz_repro
>
> ============================================
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------
> kworker/0:3/5740 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline]
> ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: virtio_transport_recv_listen+0x964/0x2120 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1577
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline]
> ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0xa26/0x2800 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1668
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
>        CPU0
>        ----
>   lock(sk_lock-AF_VSOCK);
>   lock(sk_lock-AF_VSOCK);
>
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
>
>  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
> 4 locks held by kworker/0:3/5740:
>  #0: ffff8881150d3540 ((wq_completion)vsock-loopback){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3289 [inline]
>  #0: ffff8881150d3540 ((wq_completion)vsock-loopback){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0xa35/0x1860 kernel/workqueue.c:3397
>  #1: ffffc90003fafc40 ((work_completion)(&vsock->pkt_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3290 [inline]
>  #1: ffffc90003fafc40 ((work_completion)(&vsock->pkt_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0xa70/0x1860 kernel/workqueue.c:3397
>  #2: ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline]
>  #2: ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0xa26/0x2800 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1668
>  #3: ffff88810efb5120 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK/1){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: virtio_transport_recv_listen+0x83f/0x2120 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1564
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5740 Comm: kworker/0:3 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> Workqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  print_deadlock_bug+0x279/0x290 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3041
>  check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3093 [inline]
>  validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3895 [inline]
>  __lock_acquire+0x253f/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
>  lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
>  lock_sock_nested+0x41/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3790
>  lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline]
>  virtio_transport_recv_listen+0x964/0x2120 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1577
>  virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1570/0x2800 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1692
>  vsock_loopback_work+0x32c/0x3f0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:142
>  process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3314 [inline]
>  process_scheduled_works+0xb5d/0x1860 kernel/workqueue.c:3397
>  worker_thread+0xa53/0xfc0 kernel/workqueue.c:3478
>  kthread+0x389/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436
>  ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
>  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
>  </TASK>
>
>
> ***
>
> If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
> separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
>   Tested-by: [email protected]
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> syzbot ci engineers can be reached at [email protected].
>
> To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test`
> (should be on a separate line).
>
> The patch should be attached to the email.
> Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported.
>
> The email will later be sent to:
> [[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]]
>
> If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
> #syz upstream
>
> If the report is a false positive, reply with
> #syz invalid
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/6a236acc.c25708ab.1b19ef.0000.GAE%40google.com.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.