Re: [moderation/CI] Re: vsock/virtio: fix memory leak in virtio_transport_recv_listen
Pimyn Girgis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.syzbot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJWNTGyLasZLp5b9LUUWydR5R0jNo20O-uwXwXqNX=F_N=gzYw@mail.gmail.com> |
#syz upstream On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 3:33 AM syzbot ci <[email protected]> wrote: > > syzbot ci has tested the following series > > [v1] vsock/virtio: fix memory leak in virtio_transport_recv_listen > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] > * [PATCH] vsock/virtio: fix memory leak in virtio_transport_recv_listen > > and found the following issue: > possible deadlock in virtio_transport_recv_listen > > Full report is available here: > https://ci.syzbot.org/series/76f40e62-5a21-46d4-a636-10f0ec9c5040 > > *** > > possible deadlock in virtio_transport_recv_listen > > tree: net-next > URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git > base: bfa3d89cc15c09f7d1581c834a5ed725189ec19f > arch: amd64 > compiler: Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8 > config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/5a94a424-94b1-4b1e-8b06-74d59933368f/config > syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/a8224003-11b3-4232-a635-6755ad892149/syz_repro > > ============================================ > WARNING: possible recursive locking detected > syzkaller #0 Not tainted > -------------------------------------------- > kworker/0:3/5740 is trying to acquire lock: > ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline] > ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: virtio_transport_recv_listen+0x964/0x2120 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1577 > > but task is already holding lock: > ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline] > ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0xa26/0x2800 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1668 > > other info that might help us debug this: > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 > ---- > lock(sk_lock-AF_VSOCK); > lock(sk_lock-AF_VSOCK); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > > May be due to missing lock nesting notation > > 4 locks held by kworker/0:3/5740: > #0: ffff8881150d3540 ((wq_completion)vsock-loopback){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3289 [inline] > #0: ffff8881150d3540 ((wq_completion)vsock-loopback){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0xa35/0x1860 kernel/workqueue.c:3397 > #1: ffffc90003fafc40 ((work_completion)(&vsock->pkt_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3290 [inline] > #1: ffffc90003fafc40 ((work_completion)(&vsock->pkt_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0xa70/0x1860 kernel/workqueue.c:3397 > #2: ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline] > #2: ffff88810efb62a0 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0xa26/0x2800 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1668 > #3: ffff88810efb5120 (sk_lock-AF_VSOCK/1){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: virtio_transport_recv_listen+0x83f/0x2120 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1564 > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5740 Comm: kworker/0:3 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 > Workqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work > Call Trace: > <TASK> > dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120 > print_deadlock_bug+0x279/0x290 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3041 > check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3093 [inline] > validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3895 [inline] > __lock_acquire+0x253f/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237 > lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 > lock_sock_nested+0x41/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3790 > lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline] > virtio_transport_recv_listen+0x964/0x2120 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1577 > virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1570/0x2800 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1692 > vsock_loopback_work+0x32c/0x3f0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:142 > process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3314 [inline] > process_scheduled_works+0xb5d/0x1860 kernel/workqueue.c:3397 > worker_thread+0xa53/0xfc0 kernel/workqueue.c:3478 > kthread+0x389/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436 > ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 > ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 > </TASK> > > > *** > > If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a > separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message: > Tested-by: [email protected] > > --- > This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. > syzbot ci engineers can be reached at [email protected]. > > To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test` > (should be on a separate line). > > The patch should be attached to the email. > Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported. > > The email will later be sent to: > [[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]] > > If the report looks fine to you, reply with: > #syz upstream > > If the report is a false positive, reply with > #syz invalid > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/6a236acc.c25708ab.1b19ef.0000.GAE%40google.com.