[moderation/CI] Re: net: bridge: take care of p->flags accesses

syzbot ci <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.syzbot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v1] net: bridge: take care of p->flags accesses
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
* [PATCH net-next 1/5] bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags in sysfs
* [PATCH net-next 2/5] bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags in br_netlink.c
* [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags (I)
* [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags (II)
* [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags (III)

and found the following issue:
kernel build error

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/af3c270e-aed1-483d-aca2-8e328e1d9aa9

***

kernel build error

tree:      net-next
URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git
base:      67ad35a58a88c360136d893cbc4c7f5b14100bb9
arch:      amd64
compiler:  Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/866adee7-16cc-49c4-bfec-0fb43ebb02b2/config

net/bridge/br_mrp.c:1249:23: error: use of undeclared identifier 'BR_MRP_AWARE_BI'; did you mean 'BR_MRP_AWARE_BIT'?

***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
  Tested-by: [email protected]

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at [email protected].

To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test`
(should be on a separate line).

The patch should be attached to the email.
Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported.

The email will later be sent to:
[[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream

If the report is a false positive, reply with
#syz invalid
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.