[moderation/CI] Re: net: bridge: take care of p->flags accesses
syzbot ci <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.syzbot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
syzbot ci has tested the following series [v1] net: bridge: take care of p->flags accesses https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] * [PATCH net-next 1/5] bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags in sysfs * [PATCH net-next 2/5] bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags in br_netlink.c * [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags (I) * [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags (II) * [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: bridge: use atomic ops to read/change p->flags (III) and found the following issue: kernel build error Full report is available here: https://ci.syzbot.org/series/af3c270e-aed1-483d-aca2-8e328e1d9aa9 *** kernel build error tree: net-next URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git base: 67ad35a58a88c360136d893cbc4c7f5b14100bb9 arch: amd64 compiler: Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8 config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/866adee7-16cc-49c4-bfec-0fb43ebb02b2/config net/bridge/br_mrp.c:1249:23: error: use of undeclared identifier 'BR_MRP_AWARE_BI'; did you mean 'BR_MRP_AWARE_BIT'? *** If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message: Tested-by: [email protected] --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. syzbot ci engineers can be reached at [email protected]. To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test` (should be on a separate line). The patch should be attached to the email. Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported. The email will later be sent to: [[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]] If the report looks fine to you, reply with: #syz upstream If the report is a false positive, reply with #syz invalid