Re: [moderation/CI] Re: netfilter: ipset fixes, second batch

Pimyn Girgis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.syzbot
Message-ID <CAJWNTGxEA+qKRENVr6bwkT+umoqLJCe3wJkWJ_MFcs0u-zLLUA@mail.gmail.com>
#syz upstream


On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 3:22 PM syzbot ci
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> syzbot ci has tested the following series
>
> [v3] netfilter: ipset fixes, second batch
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
> * [PATCH v3 1/7] netfilter: ipset: Don't use test_bit() in lockless RCU readers in hash types
> * [PATCH v3 2/7] netfilter: ipset: Don't use test_bit() in lockless RCU readers in bitmap types
> * [PATCH v3 3/7] netfilter: ipset: fix order of kfree_rcu() and rcu_assign_pointer()
> * [PATCH v3 4/7] netfilter: ipset: exlude gc when resize is in progress
> * [PATCH v3 5/7] netfilter: ipset: make sure gc is properly stopped
> * [PATCH v3 6/7] netfilter: ipset: cleanup the add/del backlog when resize failed
> * [PATCH v3 7/7] netfilter: ipset: rework cidr bookkeeping
>
> and found the following issues:
> * INFO: trying to register non-static key in hash_ipportip6_resize
> * INFO: trying to register non-static key in hash_netport6_resize
> * INFO: trying to register non-static key in hash_netportnet6_resize
>
> Full report is available here:
> https://ci.syzbot.org/series/7264660b-3f58-4809-9af0-c77ead1aac16
>
> ***
>
> INFO: trying to register non-static key in hash_ipportip6_resize
>
> tree:      nf-next
> URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git
> base:      3b165c2a29cfb6453f26e1ac833ca6afd28d28cf
> arch:      amd64
> compiler:  Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
> config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/44611eeb-52b4-4b97-8744-2265cbb063fa/config
> syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/c1aaddfd-5ff4-410d-85fa-3c212552d465/syz_repro
>
> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
> you didn't initialize this object before use?
> turning off the locking correctness validator.
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5810 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  assign_lock_key+0x133/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:984
>  register_lock_class+0xcc/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1299
>  __lock_acquire+0xad/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5112
>  lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
>  __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:150 [inline]
>  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:182
>  spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:348 [inline]
>  hash_ipportip6_resize+0x4d4/0x1dd0 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_hash_gen.h:699
>  call_ad+0x463/0xb60 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c:1758
>  ip_set_ad+0x824/0x9d0 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c:1842
>  nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0xc03/0x12c0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:300
>  netlink_rcv_skb+0x232/0x4b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556
>  nfnetlink_rcv+0x2c0/0x27b0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:667
>  netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]
>  netlink_unicast+0x75c/0x8e0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
>  netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900
>  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:787 [inline]
>  __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:802 [inline]
>  ____sys_sendmsg+0x972/0x9f0 net/socket.c:2699
>  ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socket.c:2753
>  __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2785 [inline]
>  __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2790 [inline]
>  __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2788 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1bd/0x2a0 net/socket.c:2788
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> RIP: 0033:0x7f4ef2b9ce59
> Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007f4ef3b42028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4ef2e15fa0 RCX: 00007f4ef2b9ce59
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00002000000002c0 RDI: 0000000000000004
> RBP: 00007f4ef2c32d6f R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007f4ef2e16038 R14: 00007f4ef2e15fa0 R15: 00007ffd926dea58
>  </TASK>
>
>
> ***
>
> INFO: trying to register non-static key in hash_netport6_resize
>
> tree:      nf-next
> URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git
> base:      3b165c2a29cfb6453f26e1ac833ca6afd28d28cf
> arch:      amd64
> compiler:  Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
> config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/44611eeb-52b4-4b97-8744-2265cbb063fa/config
> syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/60d79dbd-6e73-4ee8-be39-8bea69cb5f52/syz_repro
>
> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
> you didn't initialize this object before use?
> turning off the locking correctness validator.
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5834 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  assign_lock_key+0x133/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:984
>  register_lock_class+0xcc/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1299
>  __lock_acquire+0xad/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5112
>  lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
>  __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:150 [inline]
>  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:182
>  spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:348 [inline]
>  hash_netport6_resize+0x548/0x1d30 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_hash_gen.h:699
>  call_ad+0x463/0xb60 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c:1758
>  ip_set_ad+0x824/0x9d0 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c:1842
>  nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0xc03/0x12c0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:300
>  netlink_rcv_skb+0x232/0x4b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556
>  nfnetlink_rcv+0x2c0/0x27b0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:667
>  netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]
>  netlink_unicast+0x75c/0x8e0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
>  netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900
>  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:787 [inline]
>  __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:802 [inline]
>  ____sys_sendmsg+0x972/0x9f0 net/socket.c:2699
>  ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socket.c:2753
>  __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2785 [inline]
>  __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2790 [inline]
>  __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2788 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1bd/0x2a0 net/socket.c:2788
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> RIP: 0033:0x7f5c11d9ce59
> Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007f5c113dd028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f5c12016090 RCX: 00007f5c11d9ce59
> RDX: 0000000000000090 RSI: 00002000000002c0 RDI: 0000000000000004
> RBP: 00007f5c11e32d6f R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007f5c12016128 R14: 00007f5c12016090 R15: 00007ffd4124a0a8
>  </TASK>
>
>
> ***
>
> INFO: trying to register non-static key in hash_netportnet6_resize
>
> tree:      nf-next
> URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git
> base:      3b165c2a29cfb6453f26e1ac833ca6afd28d28cf
> arch:      amd64
> compiler:  Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
> config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/44611eeb-52b4-4b97-8744-2265cbb063fa/config
> syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/a0e027e2-8833-4fe6-8f75-2f388682c035/syz_repro
>
> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
> you didn't initialize this object before use?
> turning off the locking correctness validator.
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5880 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  assign_lock_key+0x133/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:984
>  register_lock_class+0xcc/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1299
>  __lock_acquire+0xad/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5112
>  lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
>  __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:150 [inline]
>  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:182
>  spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:348 [inline]
>  hash_netportnet6_resize+0x5aa/0x2040 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_hash_gen.h:699
>  call_ad+0x463/0xb60 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c:1758
>  ip_set_ad+0x824/0x9d0 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c:1842
>  nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0xc03/0x12c0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:300
>  netlink_rcv_skb+0x232/0x4b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556
>  nfnetlink_rcv+0x2c0/0x27b0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:667
>  netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]
>  netlink_unicast+0x75c/0x8e0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
>  netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900
>  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:787 [inline]
>  __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:802 [inline]
>  ____sys_sendmsg+0x972/0x9f0 net/socket.c:2699
>  ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socket.c:2753
>  __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2785 [inline]
>  __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2790 [inline]
>  __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2788 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1bd/0x2a0 net/socket.c:2788
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> RIP: 0033:0x7f9c00b9ce59
> Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007f9c01a82028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9c00e15fa0 RCX: 00007f9c00b9ce59
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00002000000002c0 RDI: 0000000000000004
> RBP: 00007f9c00c32d6f R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007f9c00e16038 R14: 00007f9c00e15fa0 R15: 00007ffe8ca45b58
>  </TASK>
>
>
> ***
>
> If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
> separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
>   Tested-by: [email protected]
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> syzbot ci engineers can be reached at [email protected].
>
> To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test`
> (should be on a separate line).
>
> The patch should be attached to the email.
> Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported.
>
> The email will later be sent to:
> [[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]]
>
> If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
> #syz upstream
>
> If the report is a false positive, reply with
> #syz invalid
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/6a329fae.8c9cf54e.2a1067.0019.GAE%40google.com.



-- 
Pimyn Girgis - Ⲡⲟⲓⲙⲏⲛ Ⲅⲉⲱⲣⲅⲓⲟⲥ
Software Engineer
Kernel Dynamic Analysis
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.