Re: [moderation/CI] Re: nfc: nci: fix uninit-value in nci_core_init_rsp_packet()
Pimyn Girgis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.syzbot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJWNTGz83f5hOXmywTTWAWTO9CUAWnnDkyfUG_1pVohVgn2a8Q@mail.gmail.com> |
#syz upstream On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 4:32 AM syzbot ci <[email protected]> wrote: > > syzbot ci has tested the following series > > [v1] nfc: nci: fix uninit-value in nci_core_init_rsp_packet() > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] > * [PATCH net] nfc: nci: fix uninit-value in nci_core_init_rsp_packet() > > and found the following issue: > UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in nci_init_complete_req > > Full report is available here: > https://ci.syzbot.org/series/2a9a8657-37a3-4dce-8cb5-2035027791dd > > *** > > UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in nci_init_complete_req > > tree: linux-next > URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next > base: a986fde914d88af47eb78fd29c5d1af7952c3500 > arch: amd64 > compiler: Debian clang version 22.1.6 (++20260514074242+fc4aad7b5db3-1~exp1~20260514074407.73), Debian LLD 22.1.6 > config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/80f835c3-e998-47ff-aaa5-24c578af3b4e/config > syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/65008893-2498-4786-b913-f2c474a7b34a/syz_repro > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/nfc/nci/core.c:192:7 > index 4 is out of range for type '__u8[4]' (aka 'unsigned char[4]') > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5905 Comm: syz.1.33 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120 > ubsan_epilogue+0xa/0x30 lib/ubsan.c:233 > __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xe8/0xf0 lib/ubsan.c:455 > nci_init_complete_req+0x255/0x460 net/nfc/nci/core.c:192 > __nci_request+0x7d/0x300 net/nfc/nci/core.c:108 > nci_open_device net/nfc/nci/core.c:529 [inline] > nci_dev_up+0x8c3/0xdc0 net/nfc/nci/core.c:643 > nfc_dev_up+0x165/0x350 net/nfc/core.c:118 > nfc_genl_dev_up+0x89/0xe0 net/nfc/netlink.c:775 > genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x233/0x340 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1114 > genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1194 [inline] > genl_rcv_msg+0x614/0x7a0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1209 > netlink_rcv_skb+0x226/0x4a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556 > genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1218 > netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] > netlink_unicast+0x7bb/0x940 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 > netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900 > sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:775 [inline] > __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:790 [inline] > ____sys_sendmsg+0x9b9/0xa20 net/socket.c:2684 > ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socket.c:2738 > __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2770 [inline] > __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2775 [inline] > __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2773 [inline] > __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1b1/0x290 net/socket.c:2773 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f > RIP: 0033:0x7f55ead9ce59 > Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > RSP: 002b:00007f55ebcb9028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f55eb015fa0 RCX: 00007f55ead9ce59 > RDX: 0000000004008054 RSI: 0000200000000200 RDI: 0000000000000005 > RBP: 00007f55eae32e6f R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 > R13: 00007f55eb016038 R14: 00007f55eb015fa0 R15: 00007ffcba11c798 > </TASK> > ---[ end trace ]--- > > > *** > > If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a > separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message: > Tested-by: [email protected] > > --- > This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. > syzbot ci engineers can be reached at [email protected]. > > To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test` > (should be on a separate line). > > The patch should be attached to the email. > Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported. > > The email will later be sent to: > [[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]] > > If the report looks fine to you, reply with: > #syz upstream > > If the report is a false positive, reply with > #syz invalid > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/6a3b41a1.c358b6d0.89040.0006.GAE%40google.com. -- Ⲡⲟⲓⲙⲏⲛ Ⲅⲉⲱⲣⲅⲓⲟⲥ - Pimyn Girgis Software Engineer Kernel Dynamic Analysis [email protected]