Re: [PATCH] udf: Mark LVID buffer as uptodate before marking it dirty

On Tue 23-06-26 12:30:52, syzbot wrote:
> From: Aleksandr Nogikh <[email protected]>
> 
> When an I/O error occurs while writing the Logical Volume Integrity
> Descriptor (LVID) buffer to the block device, the block layer's completion
> handler (`end_buffer_write_sync()`) clears the `BH_Uptodate` flag on the
> buffer. However, the buffer still contains valid LVID data in memory. If
> the filesystem is subsequently remounted read-write or synced,
> `udf_open_lvid()` or `udf_sync_fs()` will modify the LVID buffer and call
> `mark_buffer_dirty()`. This triggers a spurious
> `WARN_ON_ONCE(!buffer_uptodate(bh))` warning in `mark_buffer_dirty()`
> because the buffer is not marked uptodate, even though its in-memory
> contents are valid and are about to be overwritten.
> 
> To prevent this spurious warning, unconditionally set the `BH_Uptodate`
> flag before calling `mark_buffer_dirty()` in `udf_open_lvid()` and
> `udf_sync_fs()`. This acknowledges that the in-memory buffer is valid and
> matches the workaround previously applied to `udf_close_lvid()` in commit
> 853a0c25baf9 ("udf: Mark LVID buffer as uptodate before marking it dirty").
> Extending this workaround ensures consistent behavior across all LVID
> updates.
> 
> Buffer I/O error on dev loop0, logical block 128, lost sync page write
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> !buffer_uptodate(bh)
> WARNING: fs/buffer.c:1087 at mark_buffer_dirty+0x299/0x410 fs/buffer.c:1087
> ...
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  udf_open_lvid+0x369/0x5b0 fs/udf/super.c:2078
>  udf_reconfigure+0x336/0x540 fs/udf/super.c:679
>  reconfigure_super+0x232/0x8f0 fs/super.c:1080
>  vfs_cmd_reconfigure fs/fsopen.c:268 [inline]
>  vfs_fsconfig_locked+0x171/0x320 fs/fsopen.c:297
>  __do_sys_fsconfig fs/fsopen.c:463 [inline]
>  __se_sys_fsconfig+0x6b9/0x810 fs/fsopen.c:350
>  do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
>  </TASK>
> 
> Fixes: 853a0c25baf9 ("udf: Mark LVID buffer as uptodate before marking it dirty")
> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Gemini:gemini-3-flash-preview syzbot
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0306b38d9ed6ef71467d
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=05f8e20f-f080-4c7f-a206-08dbc15cb4a1
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Nogikh <[email protected]>

Thanks. I've added the patch to my tree.

								Honza

> 
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
> index cad2e15d6..7fa2e52cf 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/super.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/super.c
> @@ -2040,6 +2040,17 @@ static int udf_load_vrs(struct super_block *sb, struct udf_options *uopt,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void udf_mark_buffer_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * We set buffer uptodate unconditionally here to avoid spurious
> +	 * warnings from mark_buffer_dirty() when previous EIO has marked
> +	 * the buffer as !uptodate
> +	 */
> +	set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> +	mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> +}
> +
>  static void udf_finalize_lvid(struct logicalVolIntegrityDesc *lvid)
>  {
>  	struct timespec64 ts;
> @@ -2075,7 +2086,7 @@ static void udf_open_lvid(struct super_block *sb)
>  		UDF_SET_FLAG(sb, UDF_FLAG_INCONSISTENT);
>  
>  	udf_finalize_lvid(lvid);
> -	mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> +	udf_mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
>  	sbi->s_lvid_dirty = 0;
>  	mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
>  	/* Make opening of filesystem visible on the media immediately */
> @@ -2108,14 +2119,8 @@ static void udf_close_lvid(struct super_block *sb)
>  	if (!UDF_QUERY_FLAG(sb, UDF_FLAG_INCONSISTENT))
>  		lvid->integrityType = cpu_to_le32(LVID_INTEGRITY_TYPE_CLOSE);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * We set buffer uptodate unconditionally here to avoid spurious
> -	 * warnings from mark_buffer_dirty() when previous EIO has marked
> -	 * the buffer as !uptodate
> -	 */
> -	set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
>  	udf_finalize_lvid(lvid);
> -	mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> +	udf_mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
>  	sbi->s_lvid_dirty = 0;
>  	mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
>  	/* Make closing of filesystem visible on the media immediately */
> @@ -2397,7 +2402,7 @@ static int udf_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
>  		 * Blockdevice will be synced later so we don't have to submit
>  		 * the buffer for IO
>  		 */
> -		mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> +		udf_mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
>  		sbi->s_lvid_dirty = 0;
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
> 
> 
> base-commit: 8cd9520d35a6c38db6567e97dd93b1f11f185dc6
> -- 
> See https://goo.gle/syzbot-ai-patches for information about AI-generated patches.
> You can comment on the patch as usual, syzbot will try to address
> the comments and send a new version of the patch if necessary.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at [email protected].
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR