Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Drop WARN_ON_ONCE() for concurrently disappearing interrupts

Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.syzbot,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026, syzbot wrote:
> From: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> 
> A warning can be triggered in kvm_check_and_inject_events() when an
> interrupt disappears between the time it is checked via
> kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr() and the time it is fetched via
> kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(). This occurs because the warning incorrectly
> assumes that if an interrupt is injectable, fetching it must always return
> a valid interrupt vector (i.e., not -1).
> 
> However, this assumption is broken by level-triggered interrupts that are
> deasserted concurrently by another thread. For example, if a misconfigured
> PIT or a PCI device asserts and then immediately deasserts a
> level-triggered interrupt, the VCPU thread might see the pending interrupt
> during the check but find it gone during the fetch, resulting in
> kvm_cpu_get_interrupt() returning -1.

I think this the race is limited to the PIC case, no?  Because for all other
cases, mucking with pending IRQs requires holding vcpu->mutex.

So rather than removing the WARN entirely, can't we fix this by exempting the
in-kernel PIC case?  Given that we're pushing hard to move to a split IRQCHIP
model, this would preserve the WARN for the use case we care most about.

diff --git arch/x86/kvm/x86.c arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 3a2e4493516f..64f6592f5b23 100644
--- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7694,7 +7694,7 @@ static int kvm_check_and_inject_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
                if (r) {
                        int irq = kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu);
 
-                       if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(irq == -1)) {
+                       if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(irq == -1 && !pic_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))) {
                                kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, irq, false);
                                kvm_x86_call(inject_irq)(vcpu, false);
                                WARN_ON(kvm_x86_call(interrupt_allowed)(vcpu, true) < 0);

> The warning manifests as follows:
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> irq == -1
> WARNING: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10860 at kvm_check_and_inject_events
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10860 [inline]
> WARNING: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10860 at vcpu_enter_guest
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11356 [inline]
> WARNING: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10860 at vcpu_run+0x57ec/0x7950
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11770
> RIP: 0010:kvm_check_and_inject_events arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10860 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:vcpu_enter_guest arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11356 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:vcpu_run+0x57ec/0x7950 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11770
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x1193/0x2070 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:12125
>  kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0xa61/0xfd0 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4470
>  vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
>  __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]
>  __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:583
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>  </TASK>
> 
> Since this is a legitimate Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) race
> condition that can occur during normal operation, WARN_ON_ONCE() must not
> be used for conditions that can legitimately happen. The patch removes the
> WARN_ON_ONCE() in kvm_check_and_inject_events() and replaces it with a
> pr_err_ratelimited() to log the event instead.

If we can't salvage the WARN, I don't want to log anything to dmesg.  The purpose
of the WARN is to find KVM bugs.  A ratelimited printk isn't going to help on that
front.

> Fixes: bf672720e83c ("KVM: x86: check the kvm_cpu_get_interrupt result before using it")
> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Gemini:gemini-3-flash-preview syzbot
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=dd769db18693736eee89
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=35cad3cd-95fd-4c0d-8ca8-812f58d56e59
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 0550359ed..c5b4cddd9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -10857,10 +10857,13 @@ static int kvm_check_and_inject_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		if (r) {
>  			int irq = kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu);
>  
> -			if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(irq == -1)) {
> +			if (irq != -1) {
>  				kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, irq, false);
>  				kvm_x86_call(inject_irq)(vcpu, false);
>  				WARN_ON(kvm_x86_call(interrupt_allowed)(vcpu, true) < 0);
> +			} else {
> +				pr_err_ratelimited(
> +					"KVM: interrupt disappeared between checking and fetching\n");
>  			}
>  		}
>  		if (kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(vcpu))
> 
> 
> base-commit: 8cd9520d35a6c38db6567e97dd93b1f11f185dc6
> -- 
> See https://goo.gle/syzbot-ai-patches for information about AI-generated patches.
> You can comment on the patch as usual, syzbot will try to address
> the comments and send a new version of the patch if necessary.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at [email protected].
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.