Re: [moderation/CI] Re: bpf: Introduce static-defined tracing probe for BPF
Aleksandr Nogikh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.syzbot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANp29Y7+ktE-0VJTd-MCYj6KHTwNvCWEd1-3LG2jBFCkVJ+-cA@mail.gmail.com> |
#syz upstream On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 9:07 PM syzbot ci <[email protected]> wrote: > > syzbot ci has tested the following series > > [v1] bpf: Introduce static-defined tracing probe for BPF > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 01/12] libbpf: Prepare bpf SDT probe section for the linker > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 02/12] libbpf: Introduce bpf SDT probe macros > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 03/12] libbpf: Add bpf_sdt_notes section parser > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Create insn_array map for bpf SDT probe > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Collect SDT probe BTF IDs from BTF decl tags > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Add type check for SDT probe site > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Record probe name in SDT map > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 08/12] libbpf: Add libbpf support to load SDT observer program > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 09/12] bpf: Add kernel support to load SDT observer program > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 10/12] bpf: Support attach and detach for SDT observer program > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 11/12] bpf, x86: Add JIT support SDT for probe > * [RFC PATCH bpf-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf SDT probe > > and found the following issue: > general protection fault in do_jit > > Full report is available here: > https://ci.syzbot.org/series/86d21ab6-d0e1-4dd3-b7e1-af4571d27460 > > *** > > general protection fault in do_jit > > tree: bpf-next > URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git > base: 53435562a725962e4de0c29653223129ba11643a > arch: amd64 > compiler: Debian clang version 22.1.6 (++20260514074242+fc4aad7b5db3-1~exp1~20260514074407.73), Debian LLD 22.1.6 > config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/549153a4-d4b8-46a4-8266-df26ad835e2f/config > syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/2efaa7e4-eae0-45d0-b336-f0e311f8356e/syz_repro > > Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000010e: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI > KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000870-0x0000000000000877] > CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5818 Comm: syz.2.19 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 > RIP: 0010:do_jit+0x7c8c/0x12a90 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2806 > Code: 49 83 c4 44 4c 89 e0 48 c1 e8 03 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 0f 85 0a 84 00 00 45 03 34 24 48 8b bc 24 a0 01 00 00 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <80> 3c 10 00 74 17 e8 49 30 b0 00 48 8b bc 24 a0 01 00 00 48 ba 00 > RSP: 0018:ffffc900038cf640 EFLAGS: 00010202 > RAX: 000000000000010e RBX: 000000000000001c RCX: 0000000000000000 > RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000870 > RBP: ffffc900038cfa00 R08: ffff88816bb0d940 R09: 0000000000000096 > R10: 00000000000000fb R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8881749b8044 > R13: ffff88816c445450 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000000 > FS: 00007f06814986c0(0000) GS:ffff8882a9224000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00007f0680472780 CR3: 000000001cfc8000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > bpf_int_jit_compile+0x8af/0x1620 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:3946 > bpf_prog_jit_compile kernel/bpf/core.c:2571 [inline] > __bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x4e2/0xb20 kernel/bpf/core.c:2640 > bpf_migrate_filter net/core/filter.c:1318 [inline] > bpf_prepare_filter+0x10ef/0x1280 net/core/filter.c:1366 > sk_attach_filter+0x24/0x140 net/core/filter.c:1550 > tun_attach_filter+0x176/0x280 drivers/net/tun.c:2992 > __tun_chr_ioctl+0x15f1/0x1e10 drivers/net/tun.c:3344 > vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] > __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline] > __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:583 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f > RIP: 0033:0x7f068059ce59 > Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > RSP: 002b:00007f0681498028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f0680815fa0 RCX: 00007f068059ce59 > RDX: 0000200000000300 RSI: 00000000401054d5 RDI: 0000000000000003 > RBP: 00007f0680632e6f R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 > R13: 00007f0680816038 R14: 00007f0680815fa0 R15: 00007fff056e7c98 > </TASK> > Modules linked in: > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > RIP: 0010:do_jit+0x7c8c/0x12a90 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2806 > Code: 49 83 c4 44 4c 89 e0 48 c1 e8 03 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 0f 85 0a 84 00 00 45 03 34 24 48 8b bc 24 a0 01 00 00 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <80> 3c 10 00 74 17 e8 49 30 b0 00 48 8b bc 24 a0 01 00 00 48 ba 00 > RSP: 0018:ffffc900038cf640 EFLAGS: 00010202 > RAX: 000000000000010e RBX: 000000000000001c RCX: 0000000000000000 > RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000870 > RBP: ffffc900038cfa00 R08: ffff88816bb0d940 R09: 0000000000000096 > R10: 00000000000000fb R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8881749b8044 > R13: ffff88816c445450 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000000 > FS: 00007f06814986c0(0000) GS:ffff8882a9224000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00007f06805ea540 CR3: 000000001cfc8000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 > ---------------- > Code disassembly (best guess): > 0: 49 83 c4 44 add $0x44,%r12 > 4: 4c 89 e0 mov %r12,%rax > 7: 48 c1 e8 03 shr $0x3,%rax > b: 0f b6 04 10 movzbl (%rax,%rdx,1),%eax > f: 84 c0 test %al,%al > 11: 0f 85 0a 84 00 00 jne 0x8421 > 17: 45 03 34 24 add (%r12),%r14d > 1b: 48 8b bc 24 a0 01 00 mov 0x1a0(%rsp),%rdi > 22: 00 > 23: 48 89 f8 mov %rdi,%rax > 26: 48 c1 e8 03 shr $0x3,%rax > * 2a: 80 3c 10 00 cmpb $0x0,(%rax,%rdx,1) <-- trapping instruction > 2e: 74 17 je 0x47 > 30: e8 49 30 b0 00 call 0xb0307e > 35: 48 8b bc 24 a0 01 00 mov 0x1a0(%rsp),%rdi > 3c: 00 > 3d: 48 rex.W > 3e: ba .byte 0xba > > > *** > > If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a > separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message: > Tested-by: [email protected] > > --- > This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. > syzbot ci engineers can be reached at [email protected]. > > To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test` > (should be on a separate line). > > The patch should be attached to the email. > Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported. > > The email will later be sent to: > [[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]] > > If the report looks fine to you, reply with: > #syz upstream > > If the report is a false positive, reply with > #syz invalid > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/6a401f7d.6124255a.dd83.0000.GAE%40google.com.