[moderation/CI] Re: ext4: deferred iput framework for EA inodes

syzbot ci <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.syzbot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v13] ext4: deferred iput framework for EA inodes
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
* [PATCH v13 1/4] fs: add iput_if_not_last() helper
* [PATCH v13 2/4] ext4: introduce ext4_put_ea_inode() for safe deferred iput
* [PATCH v13 3/4] ext4: convert all EA inode iput() calls to ext4_put_ea_inode()
* [PATCH v13 4/4] ext4: remove ea_inode_array mechanism in favor of ext4_put_ea_inode()

and found the following issue:
WARNING in ext4_journal_check_start

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/ce304d7b-7f32-44b5-bf6f-e579abb42a5c

***

WARNING in ext4_journal_check_start

tree:      torvalds
URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
base:      4a50a141f05a8d1737661b19ee22ff8455b94409
arch:      amd64
compiler:  Debian clang version 22.1.6 (++20260514074242+fc4aad7b5db3-1~exp1~20260514074407.73), Debian LLD 22.1.6
config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/e5413370-cf09-4540-b9d3-7d280f314ae0/config
syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/e7cd69b7-8bb9-4554-bd84-b5ebcd7a8089/syz_repro

------------[ cut here ]------------
sb_rdonly(sb)
WARNING: fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:75 at ext4_journal_check_start+0x24f/0x2b0 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:75, CPU#0: kworker/0:5/5860
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5860 Comm: kworker/0:5 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events ext4_ea_inode_work
RIP: 0010:ext4_journal_check_start+0x24f/0x2b0 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:75
Code: 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 cc cc cc cc cc e8 06 75 42 ff 41 bf fb ff ff ff eb e0 e8 f9 74 42 ff eb d3 e8 f2 74 42 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 eb c8 e8 e7 74 42 ff 90 0f 0b 90 43 80 7c 25 00 00 0f 85
RSP: 0018:ffffc900036bf888 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: ffffffff8283ecce RBX: ffff888170078000 RCX: ffff888107390000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 00000000000000ef R08: ffff8881bb53440f R09: 1ffff110376a6881
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed10376a6882 R12: dffffc0000000000
R13: 1ffff1102e00f0cd R14: ffff888170078668 R15: 0000000000000001
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88818dc20000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055557b325a28 CR3: 0000000114bfe000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x147/0x5d0 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:107
 __ext4_journal_start fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:242 [inline]
 ext4_evict_inode+0x7cb/0xf70 fs/ext4/inode.c:238
 evict+0x624/0xb50 fs/inode.c:825
 ext4_ea_inode_work+0x5c/0x90 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2974
 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3322 [inline]
 process_scheduled_works+0xa8e/0x14e0 kernel/workqueue.c:3405
 worker_thread+0xa47/0xfb0 kernel/workqueue.c:3486
 kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436
 ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
 </TASK>


***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
  Tested-by: [email protected]

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at [email protected].

To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test`
(should be on a separate line).

The patch should be attached to the email.
Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported.

The email will later be sent to:
[[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream

If the report is a false positive, reply with
#syz invalid
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.