[moderation/CI] Re: bpf: guard classic uprobes against private-stack corruption

syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v1] bpf: guard classic uprobes against private-stack corruption
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
* [PATCH bpf] bpf: guard classic uprobes against private-stack corruption

and found the following issue:
kernel build error

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/5af4a9db-80ae-4f3b-b927-c56b1321522d

***

kernel build error

tree:      bpf
URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git
base:      a13307e97d5c54b65720bb71fa379960ded1e51a
arch:      amd64
compiler:  Debian clang version 22.1.8 (++20260613092233+e80beda6e255-1~exp1~20260613092250.77), Debian LLD 22.1.8
config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/37fdf0c7-1ff7-4d3f-b725-6f37b29b9f1f/config

./include/linux/bpf.h:2652:48: error: passing 'const struct bpf_prog *' to parameter of type 'struct bpf_prog *' discards qualifiers [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers]
./include/linux/bpf.h:2653:32: error: passing 'const struct bpf_prog *' to parameter of type 'struct bpf_prog *' discards qualifiers [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers]
./include/linux/bpf.h:2654:35: error: passing 'const struct bpf_prog *' to parameter of type 'struct bpf_prog *' discards qualifiers [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers]
./include/linux/bpf.h:2668:34: error: passing 'const struct bpf_prog *' to parameter of type 'struct bpf_prog *' discards qualifiers [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers]

***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
  Tested-by: [email protected]

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at [email protected].

To test a fix for this bug, please reply with `#syz test`
(on a separate line) and attach the patch to the email.

Notes:
- The patch will be applied on top of the tested series (as an
  incremental fix).
- To test a new version of the whole series, please send it directly
  to [email protected].
- Arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported.

The email will later be sent to:
[[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream

If the report is a false positive, reply with
#syz invalid