Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Linux Kernel Code of Conduct Committee: September 30, 2023
Greg KH <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:03:10 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.tech-board-discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2023101626-equal-blazer-6b4b@gregkh> |
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:39:33AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:54:16 -0600 > Shuah Khan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear TAB members, > > > > Please review this Code of Conduct Report for April 1, 2023 through > > September 30, 2023 and give us feedback. > > > > Sorry for the late reply, just been way behind in work lately. > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Linux Kernel Code of Conduct Committee: September 30, 2023 > > > > In the period of April 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023, the Code of > > Conduct Committee received the following reports: > > > > Unacceptable behavior or comments in email: 4 > > > > The result of the investigation: > > - Education and coaching clarifying the Code of Conduct conduct > > related to normal review and patch acceptance process: 3 > > - Clarification on the Code of Conduct conduct related to > > maintainer rights and responsibility to reject code: 1 > > > > The reports were about the discussion during the patch review and > > decisions made in rejecting code and these actions are not viewed > > as violations of the Code of Conduct. > > > > Please see the excerpt from the Responsibilities section in the > > code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst document: > > > > "setting expertise expectations, making decisions and rejecting unsuitable > > contributions are not viewed as a violation of the Code of Conduct." > > Sounds to me that people are trying to use the CoC as a way to get code > accepted? Yes, people are trying to use the CoC as a way to push back on patch rejections, it's not anything new, unfortunately :( > Well, there's only 4 reports in a month. I hope that's not too > much of a hassle. 4 reports in 6 months, it's not much of a hassle so far. thanks, greg k-h